Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature???

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53999
interpreted = N
texte = >Quick OT question for the list if you will. > >Lately, I've gotten flack on another list for the size >of my signature. My first reaction was to tell them to >get a life.. However, I did some looking around and find >that the list mentioned is probably not the only list that >feels that way. So, in this lists opinion, should I >consider shortening it or should I consider the people at >this list to break away from the borg and become real people >again? > >Off list is fine if you don't want to create clutter. > >Thanks, >Donovan > I fell it best to have a small signature or non at all when posting to the talk list. Jeff -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  2. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Mark Derrick 2003)
  3. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( CN Stuff 2003)
  4. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Gary Krockover 2003)
  5. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  6. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Gary Krockover 2003)
  7. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Rob Marquardt 2003)
  8. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( "Dan Strong" 2003)
  9. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
  10. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Rob 2003)
  11. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Gary Krockover 2003)
  12. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Jesse Proudman 2003)
  13. Re: [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Jeff Logan 2003)
  14. [OT] Appropriate Signature??? ( Donovan Brooke 2003)
>Quick OT question for the list if you will. > >Lately, I've gotten flack on another list for the size >of my signature. My first reaction was to tell them to >get a life.. However, I did some looking around and find >that the list mentioned is probably not the only list that >feels that way. So, in this lists opinion, should I >consider shortening it or should I consider the people at >this list to break away from the borg and become real people >again? > >Off list is fine if you don't want to create clutter. > >Thanks, >Donovan > I fell it best to have a small signature or non at all when posting to the Talk List. Jeff -- ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Jeff Logan

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) Re(4): Small Bug: ErrorLog.txt/[FORMVARIABLES]/[ORDERFILE] (1998) WebDNA Solutions ... (1997) expired beta (1997) WebCat3.04/w*4/OS8.5.1 and aliases (1999) PCS Frames (1997) [WebDNA] Apache 2 Error Log Entry (2009) Re(5): Small Bug: ErrorLog.txt/[FORMVARIABLES]/[ORDERFILE] (1998) WebDNA 4.5 on CentOS (2006) WebCatalog dying in NT (1998) Where's Cart Created ? (1997) CASTEGORIES IN DIFFERENT FRAMES (1997) 5.0 Preview Promotion Extension (2003) Date Sorting (1997) Searching multiple fields (1997) cart info (1998) Protect (1997) TCPConnect Help (2003) Generating Report Totals (1997) Ok here is a question? (1997)