Re: Problem with broken images
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 56746
interpreted = N
texte = - I'm serving on W* 5.3.2 on OS 10.2- I have compared the source data from a couple of browsers that showed abroken image, but the html is OK- Images do work for _most_ users. (I hate it when that happens. All ornone would be much preferable.)> Is webdna setting the [rid] value or is this a file name that's> picked up by the browser when the visitor selects the file to be> uploaded? Maybe the file name is sometimes incompatible with the OS> you're using which is ... ?[rid] is the unique number of the forum post, pulled from a db. I also useit as the file name to make sure all the image are also unique and eliminatethe need for another search. > Are your visitors actually uploading image files? Many times on my> jobs website the visitors fail to recognize that a word file with a> picture in it is not a .gif or a .jpg file. The file is uploaded> properly but cannot be displayed so the browser shows its 'broken> image" icon instead.Yes, they are uploading themselves and we do get a little junk. But theyget to preview the upload before they post it (and abort if doesn't display)which has cut down on the trash. But as I said, it works for most, and forevery user on XP / IE 6.x who gets a broken image I have another who canload it just fine.My current theory is that popup killers or other security software doesn'tlike the numeric image file names (or the two dots) but I don't have enoughevidence (or understanding of those utilities) to know for sure.-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
- I'm serving on W* 5.3.2 on OS 10.2- I have compared the source data from a couple of browsers that showed abroken image, but the html is OK- Images do work for _most_ users. (I hate it when that happens. All ornone would be much preferable.)> Is webdna setting the [rid] value or is this a file name that's> picked up by the browser when the visitor selects the file to be> uploaded? Maybe the file name is sometimes incompatible with the OS> you're using which is ... ?[rid] is the unique number of the forum post, pulled from a db. I also useit as the file name to make sure all the image are also unique and eliminatethe need for another search. > Are your visitors actually uploading image files? Many times on my> jobs website the visitors fail to recognize that a word file with a> picture in it is not a .gif or a .jpg file. The file is uploaded> properly but cannot be displayed so the browser shows its 'broken> image" icon instead.Yes, they are uploading themselves and we do get a little junk. But theyget to preview the upload before they post it (and abort if doesn't display)which has cut down on the trash. But as I said, it works for most, and forevery user on XP / IE 6.x who gets a broken image I have another who canload it just fine.My current theory is that popup killers or other security software doesn'tlike the numeric image file names (or the two dots) but I don't have enoughevidence (or understanding of those utilities) to know for sure.-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Phil Herring
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Separate SSL Server (1997)
lookups (2000)
Encyption mail was Suggestions for Topics ... (1998)
New Guestbook Source (1997)
[WebDNA] New Webdna framework ! ... (addresses some initial concerns... coming into the design of a large project) (2012)
Re:no [search] with NT (1997)
docs for WebCatalog2 (1997)
syntax question, not in online refernce (1997)
WebCat and WebTen 2.0 (1997)
[IPAddress] and AutoProxy (1998)
[WebDNA] Old Problem, the exclamation point (2014)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - More limits on [include] (1997)
HTML editing and webcatalog (2000)
Bookmarked URL with cart (1998)
&fieldsdir=ra truely random?? (2000)
Linebreaks and [writefile] (2003)
[WebDNA] Authorize working connection... (2020)
Re(2): SSL, WebSTAR, WebCatalog (1998)
Options for http uploading of files (1999)
Can't Update records (1997)