Re: How to search for fields with 10 or more characters?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2004


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 60202
interpreted = N
texte = Thanks Ken for providing a workaround. It helped in this case, although now when I use [index] inside the [showif] it shows that I am filtering the results. If I use [index] outside the [showif] I get blanks. It would be nice if I could express a search just to return the results I want, rather than having to be selective about displaying results. Anyway it worked, so thanks. Yours Phil. On 26 Nov 2004, at 05:29, Kenneth Grome wrote: > It will not put undue stress on the server. It's not even doing > nested searches, which is something that might actually be considered > to put too much stress on the server. > > This is a very simple one-level search that is doing nothing more than > just retrieving all the records, then showing a subset of those > records. Everyone does this kind of search with webdna all the time > ... without any "undue stress" issues. > > Sorry to disagree with you Jesse, but this is the way I see it. > > > >> To make it clear, using this method will cause undue strain on the >> CPU. The better method would be to run a trigger every few hours or >> once a day that updated that field with the current values in the >> database. Or only change that field when the database itself >> changes. >> >> On Nov 25, 2004, at 6:50 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >> >>> >>> [search db=test.db&neFIELDNAMEdatarq=[blank]&other search stuff] >>> [founditems] >>> [showif [countchars][FIELDNAME][/countchars]<10] >> >> -- >> Jesse Williams-Proudman >> Blue Box Development :: Custom Web Solutions >> +1 (206) 347-0528 :: jesse@blueboxdev.com > > -- > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > www.kengrome.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? ( "WebDna @ Inkblot Media" 2004)
  2. Re: How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? ( Brian Fries 2004)
  3. Re: How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? ( "WebDna @ Inkblot Media" 2004)
  4. Re: How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  5. Re: How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? ( "WebDna @ Inkblot Media" 2004)
  6. Re: How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  7. Re: How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? ( Philip Edell 2004)
  8. Re: How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  9. Re: How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? ( Jesse Proudman 2004)
  10. Re: How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? ( Kenneth Grome 2004)
  11. How to search for fields with 10 or more characters? ( Philip Edell 2004)
Thanks Ken for providing a workaround. It helped in this case, although now when I use [index] inside the [showif] it shows that I am filtering the results. If I use [index] outside the [showif] I get blanks. It would be nice if I could express a search just to return the results I want, rather than having to be selective about displaying results. Anyway it worked, so thanks. Yours Phil. On 26 Nov 2004, at 05:29, Kenneth Grome wrote: > It will not put undue stress on the server. It's not even doing > nested searches, which is something that might actually be considered > to put too much stress on the server. > > This is a very simple one-level search that is doing nothing more than > just retrieving all the records, then showing a subset of those > records. Everyone does this kind of search with webdna all the time > ... without any "undue stress" issues. > > Sorry to disagree with you Jesse, but this is the way I see it. > > > >> To make it clear, using this method will cause undue strain on the >> CPU. The better method would be to run a trigger every few hours or >> once a day that updated that field with the current values in the >> database. Or only change that field when the database itself >> changes. >> >> On Nov 25, 2004, at 6:50 AM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >> >>> >>> [search db=test.db&neFIELDNAMEdatarq=[blank]&other search stuff] >>> [founditems] >>> [showif [countchars][FIELDNAME][/countchars]<10] >> >> -- >> Jesse Williams-Proudman >> Blue Box Development :: Custom Web Solutions >> +1 (206) 347-0528 :: jesse@blueboxdev.com > > -- > > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome > www.kengrome.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Philip Edell

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

File Upload (1997) WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997) Not reading blanks (1998) Shipping formula problem (1997) Test (2003) Update DB (2001) [ShowNext] feature in 2.0 (1997) Problem passing variables - IE vs Netscape (2000) Multiple adding (1997) Bug or syntax error on my part? (1997) orderfile location (1999) RE: Formulas.db + Users.db (1997) WC2b15 File Corruption (1997) [isfile] ? (1997) WebMerchant Mac 3.0 beta available (1998) [sendmail] bug? (2000) windows file upload = weirdness (2004) [writefile] (1997) unable to launch acgi in WebCat (1997) [defined]ish (1997)