Re: [OT] Visual Fox Pro vs. SQL

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2005


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 61210
interpreted = N
texte = Will Starck wrote: > One company's offering uses Visual Fox Pro 9. We would like to use > wireless tablet PCs to check patients in and out, etc, which the SQL > based products vendors support (they say). Also, we have two offices, so > we want to have a centralized server that can be accessed from the other > office via a VPN. > > The VFP 9 based product's vendor bad mouths wireless connections: VFP is a shared-database application (like Access is), which means each instance of the application must connect to the actual database files to perform queries and updates. This makes is unreliable for situations where the network connectivity is not perfect (or even just slow). However, you could consider using that application in a Terminal server setup. Run TS on the central server and have the tablet PC's use TS to access the application. The database is always local to the TS session and this should be much more reliable over VPN's. John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [OT] Visual Fox Pro vs. SQL ( "Will Starck" 2005)
  2. Re: [OT] Visual Fox Pro vs. SQL ( John Peacock 2005)
  3. [OT] Visual Fox Pro vs. SQL ( "Will Starck" 2005)
Will Starck wrote: > One company's offering uses Visual Fox Pro 9. We would like to use > wireless tablet PCs to check patients in and out, etc, which the SQL > based products vendors support (they say). Also, we have two offices, so > we want to have a centralized server that can be accessed from the other > office via a VPN. > > The VFP 9 based product's vendor bad mouths wireless connections: VFP is a shared-database application (like Access is), which means each instance of the application must connect to the actual database files to perform queries and updates. This makes is unreliable for situations where the network connectivity is not perfect (or even just slow). However, you could consider using that application in a Terminal server setup. Run TS on the central server and have the tablet PC's use TS to access the application. The database is always local to the TS session and this should be much more reliable over VPN's. John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ John Peacock

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

pc (1997) POS (2000) [WebDNA] Accepting an XML via HTTP (2013) date and time stamp (2003) DataBaseHelper Flawed (1997) listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997) BannerAds demo (1998) Building Calendars (1997) test (2000) Secure server question (1997) To Err or Not Custom Error (1999) Bug Report, maybe (1997) I'm new be kind (1997) Not really WebCat (1997) db security on NT (1997) WebCatalog 4.0.2b5 install problems (2000) Browser Info.txt (1997) Email (2000) TCPConnect / TCPSend to Solaris NN Enterprise (2002) WC2.0 Memory Requirements (1997)