Re: hmmm

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2006


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 67316
interpreted = N
texte = Yeah really is a shame. I have been re-directing my skills to MySQL, php and Perl. However, I am interested in RoR and how I may profit from it - especially in time. -adam O Donovan Brooke wrote: > devaulw@onebox.com wrote: > >> Why bother with PHP if you already know WebDNA and code sites on your >> own? > > > Because WebDNA appears to be falling behind in the form of > compatibility. I do much > more work on other peoples servers than I do on my own. Though I may > run WebDNA > 'till it just doesn't run anymore, admin's in general will not buy > WebDNA if it doesn't work with their new server. > > > > PHP is just another scripting language. >> >> I would recommend you look to Rails for something different for the >> future. > > Keep WebDNA around for your scripted sites. >> >> Bill > > My point is not what other specific options you/I are looking > into (there are many),... it's the fact that I/we (those of us who > make at least part of our living > coding WebDNA) are being forced to learn other options. > > > SMSI, can you please respond with some information about the state or > direction > of WebDNA? > > Thanks, > Donovan > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... and thanks! (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... ("Jim Lanford." 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Christer Olsson 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... ("Dan Strong" 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Bob Minor 2008)
  7. RE: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... ("Olin Lagon" 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Govinda 2008)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Gary Krockover 2008)
  10. RE: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... ("Michael A. DeLorenzo" 2008)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Patrick McCormick 2008)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... ("Brian Boegershausen" 2008)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Govinda 2008)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  15. RE: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... ("Vincent Medina" 2008)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Govinda 2008)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Dylan Wood 2008)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  19. RE: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... ("Michael A. DeLorenzo" 2008)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Bob Minor 2008)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Stuart Tremain 2008)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Terry Wilson 2008)
  26. [WebDNA] Hmmm ... (Kenneth Grome 2008)
  27. Re: hmmm ( Gary Krockover 2006)
  28. Re: hmmm ( "WebDna @ Inkblot Media" 2006)
  29. Re: hmmm ( "Howard Wolosky" 2006)
  30. Re: hmmm ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  31. Re: hmmm ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  32. Re: hmmm ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  33. Re: hmmm ( "WebDna @ Inkblot Media" 2006)
  34. Re: hmmm ( John Peacock 2006)
  35. Re: hmmm ( Clint Davis 2006)
  36. Re: hmmm ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  37. Re: hmmm ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  38. Re: hmmm ( devaulw@onebox.com 2006)
  39. Re: hmmm ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  40. Re: hmmm ( Clint Davis 2006)
  41. Re: hmmm ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  42. Re: hmmm ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  43. Re: hmmm ( Terry Wilson 2006)
  44. Re: hmmm ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  45. Re: hmmm ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  46. Re: hmmm ( "Dan Strong" 2006)
  47. Re: hmmm ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2006)
  48. Re: hmmm ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  49. Re: hmmm ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  50. Re: hmmm ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  51. Re: hmmm ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  52. Re: hmmm ( Kenneth Grome 2006)
  53. Re: hmmm ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  54. Re: hmmm ( devaulw@onebox.com 2006)
  55. Re: hmmm ( John Peacock 2006)
  56. Re: hmmm ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  57. Re: hmmm ( John Peacock 2006)
  58. Re: hmmm ( John Peacock 2006)
  59. Re: hmmm ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  60. Re: hmmm ( Kenneth Grome 2006)
  61. Re: hmmm ( John Peacock 2006)
  62. Re: hmmm ( John Peacock 2006)
  63. Re: hmmm ( Jim Ziegler 2006)
  64. Re: hmmm ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  65. Re: hmmm ( WJ Starck 2006)
  66. Re: hmmm ( Clint Davis 2006)
  67. Re: hmmm ( WJ Starck 2006)
  68. Re: hmmm ( WJ Starck 2006)
  69. Re: hmmm ( Clint Davis 2006)
  70. Re: hmmm ( Clint Davis 2006)
  71. Re: hmmm ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  72. Re: hmmm ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  73. Re: hmmm ( WJ Starck 2006)
  74. Re: hmmm ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  75. Re: hmmm ( WJ Starck 2006)
  76. Re: hmmm ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  77. Re: hmmm ( Stuart Tremain 2006)
  78. Re: hmmm ( Eric king 2006)
  79. Re: hmmm ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  80. Re: hmmm ( devaulw@onebox.com 2006)
  81. Re: hmmm ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2006)
  82. Re: hmmm ( Jesse Proudman 2006)
  83. Re: hmmm ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  84. Re: hmmm ( WJ Starck 2006)
  85. Re: hmmm ( "Bess Ho" 2006)
  86. Re: hmmm ( Chris 2006)
  87. Re: hmmm ( Adam O'Connor 2006)
  88. Re: hmmm ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  89. Re: hmmm ( devaulw@onebox.com 2006)
  90. Re: hmmm ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2006)
  91. hmmm ( Donovan Brooke 2006)
  92. Things that make you go Hmmmm (Brian B. Burton 2001)
Yeah really is a shame. I have been re-directing my skills to MySQL, php and Perl. However, I am interested in RoR and how I may profit from it - especially in time. -adam O Donovan Brooke wrote: > devaulw@onebox.com wrote: > >> Why bother with PHP if you already know WebDNA and code sites on your >> own? > > > Because WebDNA appears to be falling behind in the form of > compatibility. I do much > more work on other peoples servers than I do on my own. Though I may > run WebDNA > 'till it just doesn't run anymore, admin's in general will not buy > WebDNA if it doesn't work with their new server. > > > > PHP is just another scripting language. >> >> I would recommend you look to Rails for something different for the >> future. > > Keep WebDNA around for your scripted sites. >> >> Bill > > My point is not what other specific options you/I are looking > into (there are many),... it's the fact that I/we (those of us who > make at least part of our living > coding WebDNA) are being forced to learn other options. > > > SMSI, can you please respond with some information about the state or > direction > of WebDNA? > > Thanks, > Donovan > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Adam O'Connor

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Whats going on? (2000) Emailer setup (1997) WC 2.0 frames feature (1997) Re[2]: Error 551 (2000) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997) Download URL & access on the fly ? (1997) [WebDNA] Apache or Nginx (2016) PCS Frames (1997) Credit card types (1997) [WebDNA] shopping sites and the "old commerce tags" (2012) listcookies works only sometimes (1997) [Announce]: Web server security and password protection (1997) Weird Math and SV (1997) message board (2001) WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997) Banner DNA (1997) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) OS X (2000) Make sure I understand this??? (1997)