Re: What really killed WebDNA?

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2007


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 69378
interpreted = N
texte = I have no plans to convert from webDNA, but then I will be retiring in a couple of years. I run on an Apple XServe G5 dual processor machine running Tiger. It is faster than anything in the path between it and the user. I have no complaints. I presently run 35 pretty active business on that machine and have lots of spare capacity for growth. THe way my system is designed, I could add another server without having to do complex load sharing. So I'll stay with webDNA indefinitely. If there were a group of us willing to take it public or buy the code, I'd participate 'for the general good.' No doubt, poor marketing killed webDNA. There is another factor. I think IT types in general love complication. Makes for job security. Hence they love things like mySQL and PHP or even more complex (or expensive) solutions. I just want to get the job done, quickly and securely. WebDNA fills the bill nicely. Dean Smith On Oct 21, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Frank Nordberg wrote: > Will Starck wrote: >> So, in everyone's expert opininon, there's nothing that prevents >> WebDNA from >> being relevant in today's web programming environment? > > It's still relevant but not nearly as relevant as it used to be. > From my personal and slightly selfish point of view I'm happy as > long as I can find a host that is willing and able to have my > WebDNA based sites on their servers but that'll get harder and > harder as hardware and software is getting updated and fewer and > fewer servers are able to run WebDNA at all. > > > Frank Nordberg > http://www.musicaviva.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Toby Cox 2007)
  2. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Larry Hewitt 2007)
  3. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Jesse Proudman 2007)
  4. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  5. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Clint Davis 2007)
  6. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Matthew Bohne 2007)
  7. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Gary Krockover" 2007)
  8. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Paul Willis 2007)
  9. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  10. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Dean Smith 2007)
  11. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  12. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
  13. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Charles Kline 2007)
  14. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Frank Nordberg 2007)
  15. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Donovan Brooke 2007)
  16. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  17. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Chris Moore" 2007)
  18. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Dan Strong" 2007)
  19. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Gary Krockover 2007)
  20. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Claude Gelinas 2007)
  21. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( Stuart Tremain 2007)
  22. Re: What really killed WebDNA? ( "Vincent Medina" 2007)
  23. What really killed WebDNA? ( "Will Starck" 2007)
I have no plans to convert from webDNA, but then I will be retiring in a couple of years. I run on an Apple XServe G5 dual processor machine running Tiger. It is faster than anything in the path between it and the user. I have no complaints. I presently run 35 pretty active business on that machine and have lots of spare capacity for growth. THe way my system is designed, I could add another server without having to do complex load sharing. So I'll stay with webDNA indefinitely. If there were a group of us willing to take it public or buy the code, I'd participate 'for the general good.' No doubt, poor marketing killed webDNA. There is another factor. I think IT types in general love complication. Makes for job security. Hence they love things like mySQL and PHP or even more complex (or expensive) solutions. I just want to get the job done, quickly and securely. WebDNA fills the bill nicely. Dean Smith On Oct 21, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Frank Nordberg wrote: > Will Starck wrote: >> So, in everyone's expert opininon, there's nothing that prevents >> WebDNA from >> being relevant in today's web programming environment? > > It's still relevant but not nearly as relevant as it used to be. > From my personal and slightly selfish point of view I'm happy as > long as I can find a host that is willing and able to have my > WebDNA based sites on their servers but that'll get harder and > harder as hardware and software is getting updated and fewer and > fewer servers are able to run WebDNA at all. > > > Frank Nordberg > http://www.musicaviva.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to digest@talk.smithmicro.com> > Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Dean Smith

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

writefile and emailer (2002) auction system w/ Web Cat (1999) BW in a search (2007) Trouble starting WC under OSX (2001) Shopping problems with 2.1b3 acgi (1997) WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997) Authorize.net has gone flooey (2006) 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) help (2001) Multiple catalog databases and showcart (1997) Multiple Passwords (1997) [WebDNA] Is the AutoCommit preference still supported? (2010) [WebDNA] Combining searches (2016) Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) PCS Frames (1997) PCS Emailer's role ? (1997) Re:no [search] with NT (1997) Showif Context combined with Search (1997) Empty Shopping Carts (1998)