Re: [WebDNA] Competitors!
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2008
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100122
interpreted = N
texte = A TalkList version is clearly the best primary solution followed by a =20=forum. Each solution has its own advantages and can easily co-exist =20with each primary purpose.I do hope that WSC will continue the usage of a TalkList and =20supplement that with a Web forum.PalleOn 01/07/2008, at 20.12, Kai Gradert wrote:> I like the list format, just thought that moving the discussions =20> into a more open space will broaden the discussions.>> =96 Kai =96>> 323.304.5906 Cell> 415.869.3934 Fax>> "Consciousness is the ground of all possibilities.">> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Donovan Brooke
=20=> wrote:> Kai Gradert wrote:>> *Donovan,*>>> Just curious, have you considered moving the WebDNA discussion/list =20=> to a more public forum like Google Groups? That way it will be =20> easier for new curious folks to join the discussions. Plus you will =20=> get the benefits of search engine crawling.>> =96 Kai =96>> 323.304.5906 Cell> 415.869.3934 Fax>>> Regarding the discussion format.. I would like to keep> the data within WSC's control. We may want to re-do the ability> to search content, and to integrate WebDNA related systems.>> However, I do want to get opinions... we have always used> a list server such as this one. There has been a lot of misc.> forums that have cropped up and left over the years, but a list> server like this seems to stand the test of time.>> Another important point is that WebDNA has the ability to create =20> forums.> I think it would do a dis-service to the community to move our> discussions to a non-WebDNA system.>> The Old archives is filled with great information.. however,> sometime, a few years ago...formating was messed up pretty bad.> Also, the looks of the system is Web Vers. 1.0! ;-)>> We may have this for reference on-line again, but I don't think> we should proceed forward with that format.>> I like the idea of moving to a Forum based discussion, but> I think this would be a good question for Patricks suggestion> and rating system.. because I think people like this format.>> My reason for wanting to move to a WebDNA forum would be that all the> data, from hence forth, would remain in tact and would be> highly searchable using WebDNA's search abilities.>> Lets see if Patrick's suggestion system gets done, and maybe> we can proceed from there... not to put presure on Patrick> or anything. ;-)>>> Donovan>>> --=20> Donovan D. Brooke - VP PH/FAX: 1 (608) 291-2024> WebDNA Software Corporation 16192 Coastal Highway> Lewes, DE 19958>>Venlig hilsenPalle Bo Nielsen(PowerPalle)
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
A TalkList version is clearly the best primary solution followed by a =20=forum. Each solution has its own advantages and can easily co-exist =20with each primary purpose.I do hope that WSC will continue the usage of a TalkList and =20supplement that with a Web forum.PalleOn 01/07/2008, at 20.12, Kai Gradert wrote:> I like the list format, just thought that moving the discussions =20> into a more open space will broaden the discussions.>> =96 Kai =96>> 323.304.5906 Cell> 415.869.3934 Fax>> "Consciousness is the ground of all possibilities.">> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Donovan Brooke =20=> wrote:> Kai Gradert wrote:>> *Donovan,*>>> Just curious, have you considered moving the WebDNA discussion/list =20=> to a more public forum like Google Groups? That way it will be =20> easier for new curious folks to join the discussions. Plus you will =20=> get the benefits of search engine crawling.>> =96 Kai =96>> 323.304.5906 Cell> 415.869.3934 Fax>>> Regarding the discussion format.. I would like to keep> the data within WSC's control. We may want to re-do the ability> to search content, and to integrate WebDNA related systems.>> However, I do want to get opinions... we have always used> a list server such as this one. There has been a lot of misc.> forums that have cropped up and left over the years, but a list> server like this seems to stand the test of time.>> Another important point is that WebDNA has the ability to create =20> forums.> I think it would do a dis-service to the community to move our> discussions to a non-WebDNA system.>> The Old archives is filled with great information.. however,> sometime, a few years ago...formating was messed up pretty bad.> Also, the looks of the system is Web Vers. 1.0! ;-)>> We may have this for reference on-line again, but I don't think> we should proceed forward with that format.>> I like the idea of moving to a Forum based discussion, but> I think this would be a good question for Patricks suggestion> and rating system.. because I think people like this format.>> My reason for wanting to move to a WebDNA forum would be that all the> data, from hence forth, would remain in tact and would be> highly searchable using WebDNA's search abilities.>> Lets see if Patrick's suggestion system gets done, and maybe> we can proceed from there... not to put presure on Patrick> or anything. ;-)>>> Donovan>>> --=20> Donovan D. Brooke - VP PH/FAX: 1 (608) 291-2024> WebDNA Software Corporation 16192 Coastal Highway> Lewes, DE 19958>>Venlig hilsenPalle Bo Nielsen(PowerPalle)
Palle Bo Nielsen
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
3.0.8 PDF Manual? Do YOU have it? :) (2000)
Multiple Merchant Accounts? (1997)
Understanding texta (1997)
A little syntax help (1997)
encrypt (2000)
2 questions (2000)
problems with 2 tags shakur (1997)
PCS Frames (1997)
Applescript, WebDNA, and PDF (1997)
indexing dates (1998)
[OT] RE: Drop down menu - Part 1 (2003)
Is the list server working? (1998)
[LOOKUP] (1997)
Replace context problem ... (1997)
time and welcome (1999)
Online reference (1997)
Date Range Sorting (1997)
Shopping Cart Problem (1998)
I'm having trouble using [url][interpret][math] together inlookup (1997)
Do search engines index .tpl pages? (2006)