Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2008


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 100408
interpreted = N
texte = well since you have a date created, can't you order by that instead? each one has a timestamp to the second? Why not order by that? That will be your reverse order, surely? TC On 28 Jul 2008, at 20:02, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: > I hear you TC but, > > I just wanted to rescue one of my old DB's which do not have a > unique key nor does it include the date (look'ed-up from another DB). > > It sound logical to me to use the rank=off to display it as it was > written to the DB. It sound logical to me that I could reverse this > order with some functionality within WebDNA. It's OK with me that > WebDNA is not capable of doing this to help me out here ;) > > Unfortunately, I think I need to rescue this good old DB by > providing it with a unique serial. > > Anyways... > > Thanks all. > > Palle > Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Terry Wilson 2008)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Gary Krockover 2008)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Toby Cox 2008)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Toby Cox 2008)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Gary Krockover 2008)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Terry Wilson 2008)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Donovan Brooke 2008)
  13. [WebDNA] reverse rank=off (Palle Bo Nielsen 2008)
well since you have a date created, can't you order by that instead? each one has a timestamp to the second? Why not order by that? That will be your reverse order, surely? TC On 28 Jul 2008, at 20:02, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: > I hear you TC but, > > I just wanted to rescue one of my old DB's which do not have a > unique key nor does it include the date (look'ed-up from another DB). > > It sound logical to me to use the rank=off to display it as it was > written to the DB. It sound logical to me that I could reverse this > order with some functionality within WebDNA. It's OK with me that > WebDNA is not capable of doing this to help me out here ;) > > Unfortunately, I think I need to rescue this good old DB by > providing it with a unique serial. > > Anyways... > > Thanks all. > > Palle > Toby Cox

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Creating main- and sub-category search (1997) webmerchant/ Mac Auth. and CC refunds (1998) Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997) emailer don't work (1998) dynamic PDF no longer working? (2004) Sorting error (1997) NT Version on IIS 4.0 (1997) plugin-acgi, different results (1997) WebCatalog NT beta 18 now available (1997) Problems with ^ could be solved with [REPLACE CHARACTERS] (1997) Loss in Form (1998) webcat NT (1998) For those of you not on the WebCatalog Beta... (1997) Searching multiple fields from one form field (1997) can webcat create directories on NT? (1997) Test, please ignore (2003) Requiring that certain fields be completed (1997) Apache suffix mapping for .tpl (2000) more cookie crumbling (1999) WebCatalog 2.0 & WebDNA docs in HTML ... (1997)