Re: [WebDNA] Was: wiki Now: Object-oriented programmng
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2009
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 103976
interpreted = N
texte = William DeVaul wrote: > One thing that would help WebDNA is a framework and a coding style. I > get that these are subjective, but I would not want to > maintain/improve WebDNA code that I did not write. > > A consistent place for putting things and for coding style would go a > long way towards getting wider acceptance. The Storebuilder generated > code might be the place to start. > > Bill Bill, A very alpha start in this direction could be: http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category=617 I personally think this step (in the link above) could be a great asset to the community if it ever was adopted... in the form of either open source, or closed. In one of the welcoming threads, I post the beginnings of conventions that can be used to create a function library.. (I have to give credit to Brian Fries for this, because the ideas were adapted from some of his coding techniques). I suppose this forum category could be referred to as a place to post WebDNA classes. It would even be a nice place to discuss more conventions for these kinds of topics. Donovan -- Donovan Brooke WebDNA Software Corporation http://www.webdna.us **[Square Bracket Utopia]**
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
William DeVaul wrote: > One thing that would help WebDNA is a framework and a coding style. I > get that these are subjective, but I would not want to > maintain/improve WebDNA code that I did not write. > > A consistent place for putting things and for coding style would go a > long way towards getting wider acceptance. The Storebuilder generated > code might be the place to start. > > Bill Bill, A very alpha start in this direction could be: http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=topics&category=617 I personally think this step (in the link above) could be a great asset to the community if it ever was adopted... in the form of either open source, or closed. In one of the welcoming threads, I post the beginnings of conventions that can be used to create a function library.. (I have to give credit to Brian Fries for this, because the ideas were adapted from some of his coding techniques). I suppose this forum category could be referred to as a place to post WebDNA classes. It would even be a nice place to discuss more conventions for these kinds of topics. Donovan -- Donovan Brooke WebDNA Software Corporation http://www.webdna.us **[Square Bracket Utopia]**
Donovan Brooke
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[OT] javascript field validation with encoded forms (2004)
Multiple Pulldowns/Gary (1997)
Problems with [Applescript] (1997)
WML (2000)
Webstar 1.3.1 PPC (1997)
WebDNA on OS X Tiger (2006)
[WebDNA] Putting '&search' into URL killing all search contexts (2010)
[OT] Quick Java Question (2007)
OH MY GOD! (1998)
WebCatalog can't find database (1997)
WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997)
triggers.db (1999)
Re:trouble (1997)
2.1b3 --> way slow (1997)
request for string functions (1998)
form data submission gets truncated (1997)
[encrypt] blues.... (2000)
Hosts who have upgraded to v5.0? (2003)
Showif, Hideif reverse logic ? (1997)
Re:listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997)