What is WebDNA

WebDNA is a scripting and database system designed to easily build web applications.

WebDNA and BioType

BioType service is a biometric keystroke dynamic system. It will be part of WebDNA 8.5

Download WebDNA

Download WebDNA freeware, try it and register later if you want.

WebDNA resources

The list of all WebDNA instructions.
WebDNA
Software Corporation
Search WebDNA Site
 Menu


HOME


DOWNLOADS


LEARN


EDUCATION


NEWS


COMMUNITY


STORE


SUPPORT


CONTACT

Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2009


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 104083
interpreted = N
texte = Govinda, Thanks for your suggestion, but [ReplaceFoundItems] does not help. = WebDNA goes on it's knees; even with or without the [foundItems]. Palle On 02/12/2009, at 21.50, Govinda wrote: > just a quick thought/test - try that again but like this: >=20 > [search db=3Dl4.db&nel4_statusdata=3Ddummy&asl4_serialsort=3D1][numFound= ] > = [foundItems][ReplaceFoundItems]l4_index=3D[index][/ReplaceFoundItems][/fou= ndItems] > [/search] >=20 > using [founditems] to wrap [ReplaceFoundItems] is dumb, but how to = get the next val for the [l4_index] field with *min.* impact on = webdna.. hmmm... > Anyway, I *assume* that you are still better off with my above = suggestion than with the nested [replace] which has to find the record = all over again.. on each and every iteration. >=20 > or take it down and do it in something offline (mac? filemaker?) and = then fire it up again online.. having written code to populate the new = records *as you create them*, at the time you [append], [replace .. = &append=3DT]) >=20 > -G >=20 > On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: >=20 >> Hi all, >>=20 >> I got a DB which has 11 fields and more that 700.000 lines of data. >>=20 >> Now I need to add a new field and I need to populate this field with = an index from the number 1 to the most recent number which for example = is 700.000. >>=20 >> The number 1 is the first lines of data within this BD and the = 700.000 is the most recent added line of data. >>=20 >> If have done some test and sand-boxing and every time WebDNA goes = into it's knees. >>=20 >> I need some good advise from you all to figure out the best solution. >>=20 >> I look forward to your suggestions. >>=20 >> **** this one is rough and breaks WebDNA **** >> [search = db=3Dl4.db&nel4_statusdata=3Ddummy&asl4_serialsort=3D1][numFound][foundIte= ms] >> [replace db=3Dl4.db&eql4_skudata=3D[l4_sku]]l4_index=3D[index][/replace= ] >> [/foundItems][/search] >> **** snip **** >>=20 >>=20 >> Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >=20 > ------------ > Govinda > govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >=20 Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Donovan 2009)
  11. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (chas conquest 2009)
  12. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  13. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  14. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Donovan Brooke 2009)
  15. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  16. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  17. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  18. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  19. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Kenneth Grome 2009)
  20. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Marc Thompson 2009)
  21. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2009)
  22. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  23. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  24. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  25. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
  26. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Dan Strong 2009)
  27. Re: [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Govinda 2009)
  28. [WebDNA] A new popuated field to a DB with 700.000 records (Palle Bo Nielsen 2009)
Govinda, Thanks for your suggestion, but [replacefounditems] does not help. = WebDNA goes on it's knees; even with or without the [founditems]. Palle On 02/12/2009, at 21.50, Govinda wrote: > just a quick thought/test - try that again but like this: >=20 > [search db=3Dl4.db&nel4_statusdata=3Ddummy&asl4_serialsort=3D1][numFound= ] > = [founditems][replacefounditems]l4_index=3D[index][/ReplaceFoundItems][/fou= ndItems] > [/search] >=20 > using [founditems] to wrap [replacefounditems] is dumb, but how to = get the next val for the [l4_index] field with *min.* impact on = webdna.. hmmm... > Anyway, I *assume* that you are still better off with my above = suggestion than with the nested [replace] which has to find the record = all over again.. on each and every iteration. >=20 > or take it down and do it in something offline (mac? filemaker?) and = then fire it up again online.. having written code to populate the new = records *as you create them*, at the time you [append], [replace .. = &append=3DT]) >=20 > -G >=20 > On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Palle Bo Nielsen wrote: >=20 >> Hi all, >>=20 >> I got a DB which has 11 fields and more that 700.000 lines of data. >>=20 >> Now I need to add a new field and I need to populate this field with = an index from the number 1 to the most recent number which for example = is 700.000. >>=20 >> The number 1 is the first lines of data within this BD and the = 700.000 is the most recent added line of data. >>=20 >> If have done some test and sand-boxing and every time WebDNA goes = into it's knees. >>=20 >> I need some good advise from you all to figure out the best solution. >>=20 >> I look forward to your suggestions. >>=20 >> **** this one is rough and breaks WebDNA **** >> [search = db=3Dl4.db&nel4_statusdata=3Ddummy&asl4_serialsort=3D1][numFound][foundIte= ms] >> [replace db=3Dl4.db&eql4_skudata=3D[l4_sku]]l4_index=3D[index][/replace= ] >> [/foundItems][/search] >> **** snip **** >>=20 >>=20 >> Palle--------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ >> Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >=20 > ------------ > Govinda > govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > old archives: http://dev.webdna.us/TalkListArchive/ > Bug Reporting: = http://forum.webdna.us/eucabb.html?page=3Dtopics&category=3D288 >=20 Palle Bo Nielsen

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Multiple prices (1997) Error Log.db --however (1997) Database Repopulation (2004) Separate SSL Server (1997) [WebDNA] WebDNA app (2013) Encrypt question. (2000) WebCatalog and Macromedia Flash (1998) forced timeout? (1998) Re:No Data (1997) Re2: frames & carts (1997) Nested tags count question (1997) problems with 2 tags shakur (1997) A Suggestion? (1998) using WebCat for Associate Programs? (1998) [math] show=F exists? (1997) Typhoon Rev. and PCS store problems (1999) refreshing IE with posted .tmpl (1997) WebCat2b14MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't hide the search string (1997) Serving images from databases (1998) WebCatalog Use Question (1997)