Re: [WebDNA] TCP HTTP/1.1 questions

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106488
interpreted = N
texte = Maybe this is the cause of the problem I was having months ago when I reported unexplained delays in retrieving data via tcpconnect from a non-WebDNA site. I don't remember if I was using HTTP 1.0 or 1.1 but now that you mention this I think I'll have to go back and see what I was using ... Sincerely, Kenneth Grome > Greetings, > > I've been using APIs with WebDNA successfully with > 3rd parties like Amazon and Google using the TCP syntax. > However, there are a couple things nagging at me with > this... > > note: I am making these connections via SSL and am using > a Windows iis6 box with DNA6.0 > > I've noticed that if I make any errors constructing HTTP > headers in the send (especially to a Google API), the > dna page will often take several minutes to load. This > mostly happens when I use HTTP/1.1 as opposed to 1.0. > It seems that a well-formed 1.0 request will take > several minutes to complete if I simply change it to > 1.1. What's with this lag time? Does this have anything > to do with "chunking"? > > Is there any major differences between forming 1.0 to 1.1 > requests with WebDNA? Are there any particular > encodings or snippets that others have successfully > used? Is it important to setheaders in the page making > the request? > > In general, does anyone have any insight why I am having > problems using 1.1 rather than 1.0? > > Thanks! > > Aaron Michael > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] TCP HTTP/1.1 questions (Aaron Michael Kaczmarek 2011)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] TCP HTTP/1.1 questions (Kenneth Grome 2011)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] TCP HTTP/1.1 questions (Aaron Michael Kaczmarek 2011)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] TCP HTTP/1.1 questions (Chris Wik 2011)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] TCP HTTP/1.1 questions (Aaron Michael Kaczmarek 2011)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] TCP HTTP/1.1 questions (Kenneth Grome 2011)
  7. [WebDNA] TCP HTTP/1.1 questions (Aaron Michael Kaczmarek 2011)
Maybe this is the cause of the problem I was having months ago when I reported unexplained delays in retrieving data via tcpconnect from a non-WebDNA site. I don't remember if I was using HTTP 1.0 or 1.1 but now that you mention this I think I'll have to go back and see what I was using ... Sincerely, Kenneth Grome > Greetings, > > I've been using APIs with WebDNA successfully with > 3rd parties like Amazon and Google using the TCP syntax. > However, there are a couple things nagging at me with > this... > > note: I am making these connections via SSL and am using > a Windows iis6 box with DNA6.0 > > I've noticed that if I make any errors constructing HTTP > headers in the send (especially to a Google API), the > dna page will often take several minutes to load. This > mostly happens when I use HTTP/1.1 as opposed to 1.0. > It seems that a well-formed 1.0 request will take > several minutes to complete if I simply change it to > 1.1. What's with this lag time? Does this have anything > to do with "chunking"? > > Is there any major differences between forming 1.0 to 1.1 > requests with WebDNA? Are there any particular > encodings or snippets that others have successfully > used? Is it important to setheaders in the page making > the request? > > In general, does anyone have any insight why I am having > problems using 1.1 rather than 1.0? > > Thanks! > > Aaron Michael > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

change the number format (1997) Triggers under Windows NT (2001) [append] and SSL (1997) forms and variables (1998) Text vs. Math (2000) Webcat 4.5.1 equivalent of autonumber (2003) PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997) Special characters & [sendmail] (1998) more Dreamweaver Extensions feedback (2000) Price Not Appearing (2000) Electronic delivery (2006) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) WebDNA Solutions ... sorry! (1997) F3 crashing server (1997) WebCatalog for guestbook ? (1997) emailer (1997) Customer (1998) BR (1997) Installer AppleScript (2000) showif and cart (1997)