Re: [WebDNA] Email time bug? YES, it's a bug!

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2011


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 106747
interpreted = N
texte = I can confirm what Ken is saying here. I too have witnessed other email clients that display the time sent correctly. Marc On 6/14/2011 2:36 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>>> Does WebDNA have a problem setting the correct >>>> time on emails when the server time is set correctly?  > But two other people I worked with this morning (all three > of us in different time zones) received the same WebDNA > emails with the bad Date headers, yet their email clients > displayed the local times correctly. This is apparently > because their email clients ignored WebDNA's bad Date > header, instead favoring the Received header (added by > another SMTP server) as the basis for determining the local > message sent time. > > So my two colleagues were actually seeing the correct times > in their email clients, whereas I was seeing the wrong > times!  > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome -- ------------------------------------------- Marc Thompson Software Engineer Media Solutions University Information Technology University of Utah 801.585.9264 marc.thompson@utah.edu ------------------------------------------- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] Email time bug? YES, it's a bug! (Marc Thompson 2011)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] Email time bug? YES, it's a bug! (Kenneth Grome 2011)
I can confirm what Ken is saying here. I too have witnessed other email clients that display the time sent correctly. Marc On 6/14/2011 2:36 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote: >>>> Does WebDNA have a problem setting the correct >>>> time on emails when the server time is set correctly?  > But two other people I worked with this morning (all three > of us in different time zones) received the same WebDNA > emails with the bad Date headers, yet their email clients > displayed the local times correctly. This is apparently > because their email clients ignored WebDNA's bad Date > header, instead favoring the Received header (added by > another SMTP server) as the basis for determining the local > message sent time. > > So my two colleagues were actually seeing the correct times > in their email clients, whereas I was seeing the wrong > times!  > Sincerely, > Kenneth Grome -- ------------------------------------------- Marc Thompson Software Engineer Media Solutions University Information Technology University of Utah 801.585.9264 marc.thompson@utah.edu ------------------------------------------- Marc Thompson

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

docs for WebCatalog2 (1997) Calendar (1997) WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997) webcat- multiple selection in input field (1997) search form problem.. (1997) Search design (1997) Limitations on fields? Server is crashing (1997) WC on Mac OS X or Mac OS X Server 2.x (2001) Cart Numbers (1997) Search for dates greater than [date] (1997) Displaying text and populating form fields (2005) Blog solution (2006) Mac OSX 10.5 with WebSTAR... Webcatalog won't run (2003) Cant open pages generated by Webcat (2004) [ConvertChars] problem (1997) OT: Flash developer needed (2007) [WebDNA] HTTPS and authorization (2018) Documentation Feedback (1997) Summary search -- speed (1997) So many lookers, hey smith micro (2003)