Re: [WebDNA] postfix and dna
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2011
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 107263
interpreted = N
texte = That's pretty much my strategy, except I'm using jangosmtp.com. = SendGrid looks more pro, I might check that out instead. I'm using a = smart host configuration with Postfix so its simply relaying messages = and letting the relay take care of the rest. I want to use WebDNA to = construct the messages though, since I already have the tools to = construct the mailing lists from dbs and create the message with = tinyMCE. =20 On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Adam OConnor wrote: > I wonder if you can write locally to Postfix - then relay through an = SMTP service like SendGrid.com. Reason for this is by chance if you do = get crazy its not your IP that's being flagged. And they have an = awesome service (stats, API, etc...). The free version gets you 200 = emails/day. >=20 > I've always used my own mail servers, huge fan of Postfix, but these = days its becoming easier to let others handle it (much like DNS) as its = an ever changing landscape. As a coder I focus more on code vs. server = admin etc... >=20 > Btw - the reason I rec'd using Postfix locally is for speed and = reliability. I had a setup where we were sending 20-30k pieces of mail = / day. We had issues with doing per send - so we sent to a local copy = of Postfix which did all the queing and sending for us. We just hooked = that Postfix as a relay to our SMTP server. This allowed us to burst = out the mail and let the MTA's do their job. (I don't have code samples = as it was done in Ruby) >=20 > Best, > Adam O >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 8/24/11 11:41 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> Tom Duke wrote: >>> Donovan, >>>=20 >>> Hi - if you use SPF records (and ideally sign with DKIM), >>> auto-unsubscribe bounces, check your Sender Score, and keep an eye = on >>> what your clients are sending, then you *should* be OK. >>>=20 >>> I've been doing this for a while and have stayed off blacklists. >>>=20 >>> - Tom >>=20 >> You may be right Tom, I don't do mass mailing. I do think that it's = good you appended that info though, because it's not fun if your server = ends up in black listed. >>=20 >> Donovan >>=20 >>=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list
. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
That's pretty much my strategy, except I'm using jangosmtp.com. = SendGrid looks more pro, I might check that out instead. I'm using a = smart host configuration with Postfix so its simply relaying messages = and letting the relay take care of the rest. I want to use WebDNA to = construct the messages though, since I already have the tools to = construct the mailing lists from dbs and create the message with = tinyMCE. =20 On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Adam OConnor wrote: > I wonder if you can write locally to Postfix - then relay through an = SMTP service like SendGrid.com. Reason for this is by chance if you do = get crazy its not your IP that's being flagged. And they have an = awesome service (stats, API, etc...). The free version gets you 200 = emails/day. >=20 > I've always used my own mail servers, huge fan of Postfix, but these = days its becoming easier to let others handle it (much like DNS) as its = an ever changing landscape. As a coder I focus more on code vs. server = admin etc... >=20 > Btw - the reason I rec'd using Postfix locally is for speed and = reliability. I had a setup where we were sending 20-30k pieces of mail = / day. We had issues with doing per send - so we sent to a local copy = of Postfix which did all the queing and sending for us. We just hooked = that Postfix as a relay to our SMTP server. This allowed us to burst = out the mail and let the MTA's do their job. (I don't have code samples = as it was done in Ruby) >=20 > Best, > Adam O >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 8/24/11 11:41 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote: >> Tom Duke wrote: >>> Donovan, >>>=20 >>> Hi - if you use SPF records (and ideally sign with DKIM), >>> auto-unsubscribe bounces, check your Sender Score, and keep an eye = on >>> what your clients are sending, then you *should* be OK. >>>=20 >>> I've been doing this for a while and have stayed off blacklists. >>>=20 >>> - Tom >>=20 >> You may be right Tom, I don't do mass mailing. I do think that it's = good you appended that info though, because it's not fun if your server = ends up in black listed. >>=20 >> Donovan >>=20 >>=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
aaronmichaelmusic@gmail.com
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCatalog 4.0.2b5 available (2000)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
WebCat2 - storing unformatted date data? (1997)
Stuck - Figured out?? (2003)
Simple Store (2000)
WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997)
Navigator 4.01 (1997)
LookUp (2001)
Possible Bug in 2.0b15.acgi (1997)
Parameter Passing Value (2002)
flushdatabases (2000)
[WebDNA] Help me install (WebDNA 7 fastcgi install on Lion 10.7.3) (2012)
Search in 2 or more catalogs (1997)
WebCat2 - Getting to the browser's username/password data (1997)
FlushDatabases (2000)
[WebDNA] TCPConnect example doesn't work (2017)
New Site Announcement: MusicianStore.com goes live with (1998)
Price and Formula.db (2002)
[format] (1998)
Requiring that certain fields be completed (1997)