Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA slow processing
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2011
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 107732
interpreted = N
texte = I'd also like to know the column headers of the debug log. what does the value in the third column mean? I've got a few hosts with a ve= ry high number there (5'000'000) while others have a value between 5 and 30?= ?? is it the processing time? Thierry Am 25.11.2011 um 20:01 schrieb christophe.billiottet@webdna.us: > I am not sure this will change anything, except if WebDNA or the configura= tion became corrupted. The problem is certainly related to code. WebDNA 7.0 a= llows to isolate the problematic website in an easier way, and fixing it wou= ld just require to shut down the faulty site and isolate the code. Did you c= heck the RAM usage? when too many databases are opened, WebDNA will close so= me of them to free space for others. >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Nov 25, 2011, at 16:46, William DeVaul wrote: >=20 >> I do not know about the reinstall. I'd imagine that could be >> complicated and is best done off line or expecting some down time. >>=20 >> Bill >>=20 >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Thierry Almy
wrote: >>> We notice lots more traffic from search engines on the sites we just mov= ed >>> to another server within the same subnet, having done just minor changes= to >>> the sites. >>> I don't understand it ... >>> On our old G5 box, we host about 100 sites, most with WebDNA, and the >>> processor is between 2% and 25%, maybe for a very short time over 50%. >>> We moved a few complicated sites to the new server and there it goes up t= o >>> 185% and stays there! >>> I believe we have an error somewhere, maybe the module? >>> Is it safe to just reinstall WebDNA over the existing installation? >>> Thierry >>>=20 >>> That's what I'm seeing, the file gets big fast. I'm getting more than >>> 1600 requests per hour. Mostly search engines at work. I'm guessing >>> that my move about 6 months ago to make those pages more dynamic and >>> less static has hurt performance. >>>=20 >>> Not sure I see a clear problem except going from static to dynamic and >>> even that is a maybe. >>>=20 >>> --------------------------------------------------------- This message i= s >>> sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscr= ibe, >>> E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug >>> Reporting: support@webdna.us >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I'd also like to know the column headers of the debug log. what does the value in the third column mean? I've got a few hosts with a ve= ry high number there (5'000'000) while others have a value between 5 and 30?= ?? is it the processing time? Thierry Am 25.11.2011 um 20:01 schrieb christophe.billiottet@webdna.us: > I am not sure this will change anything, except if WebDNA or the configura= tion became corrupted. The problem is certainly related to code. WebDNA 7.0 a= llows to isolate the problematic website in an easier way, and fixing it wou= ld just require to shut down the faulty site and isolate the code. Did you c= heck the RAM usage? when too many databases are opened, WebDNA will close so= me of them to free space for others. >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Nov 25, 2011, at 16:46, William DeVaul wrote: >=20 >> I do not know about the reinstall. I'd imagine that could be >> complicated and is best done off line or expecting some down time. >>=20 >> Bill >>=20 >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Thierry Almy wrote: >>> We notice lots more traffic from search engines on the sites we just mov= ed >>> to another server within the same subnet, having done just minor changes= to >>> the sites. >>> I don't understand it ... >>> On our old G5 box, we host about 100 sites, most with WebDNA, and the >>> processor is between 2% and 25%, maybe for a very short time over 50%. >>> We moved a few complicated sites to the new server and there it goes up t= o >>> 185% and stays there! >>> I believe we have an error somewhere, maybe the module? >>> Is it safe to just reinstall WebDNA over the existing installation? >>> Thierry >>>=20 >>> That's what I'm seeing, the file gets big fast. I'm getting more than >>> 1600 requests per hour. Mostly search engines at work. I'm guessing >>> that my move about 6 months ago to make those pages more dynamic and >>> less static has hurt performance. >>>=20 >>> Not sure I see a clear problem except going from static to dynamic and >>> even that is a maybe. >>>=20 >>> --------------------------------------------------------- This message i= s >>> sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscr= ibe, >>> E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug >>> Reporting: support@webdna.us >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >> archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us >> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us > Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
"lists@almy.ch"
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
ShowNext (1997)
I give up!! (1997)
ooops...WebCatalog [FoundItems] Problem - LONG - (1997)
PayPal (was WebCatalog Help) (2002)
Set Cookie for Multiple Domain Extensions (2005)
Image maps/Webcat (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997)
Fun with Dates - finally resolved but.... (1997)
# fields limited? (1997)
Frames and WebCat (1997)
test (2005)
WC2f3 (1997)
It's working (1997)
PCS Frames (1997)
webcat restarting script on Linux? (1999)
Verify entry into a text field (2005)
multiple search commands (1997)
Time comparison question (1998)
&max= (2003)
ShowIf variables (1997)