Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2012


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 108403
interpreted = N
texte = > Hi all, >=20 > I have set up a WebNDA 7 server using Mac OS X Lion Client. I sort of = performs ok but I have had a problem where Apache has closed down on me = twice over the past 24 hours and since my data is stored in RAM and I do = not commit to database at every change to the content of RAM - well I = loose data - heavily. >=20 > So what is the best alternative to "Automatically commit databases to = disk after modification" ? And with an ambition of NOT loosing any data. >=20 > Any good suggestions? >=20 Hi Palle Just use [commitdatabase...], in code, when where you want to be sure = the data in a db, in RAM, gets written to disk, like e.g. after a = [replace]/[append]. -G Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Kenneth Grome 2012)
  2. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (christophe.billiottet@webdna.us 2012)
  3. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  4. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  5. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  6. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  7. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  8. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  9. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
  10. Re: [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Govinda 2012)
  11. [WebDNA] To Commitdatabase or Not to Commitdatabase (Palle Bo Nielsen 2012)
> Hi all, >=20 > I have set up a WebNDA 7 server using Mac OS X Lion Client. I sort of = performs ok but I have had a problem where Apache has closed down on me = twice over the past 24 hours and since my data is stored in RAM and I do = not commit to database at every change to the content of RAM - well I = loose data - heavily. >=20 > So what is the best alternative to "Automatically commit databases to = disk after modification" ? And with an ambition of NOT loosing any data. >=20 > Any good suggestions? >=20 Hi Palle Just use [commitdatabase...], in code, when where you want to be sure = the data in a db, in RAM, gets written to disk, like e.g. after a = [replace]/[append]. -G Govinda

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Math Help (2000) Reversed words (1997) [WebDNA] How to access WebDNA admin pages? (2010) Offer from ClearWay: Accelerate WebCatalog With ClearWay NITROPowerPlug! (1999) WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997) A question on sub-categories (1997) [WebDNA] securing passing info from php to webdna (2011) Upgrading old WebCat Database Files (1997) Dates - Search and Sorting (1999) [addlineitems] (1997) [searchString] (1997) WebCatb15 Mac CGI -- [purchase] (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) This message couldn't reach the list! (1998) Trouble with Netscape (1998) WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [include] doesn't allow creator (1997) Unable to view next 101-200 (1997) WebMerchant 1.6 and SHTML (1997) Dummy Credit Card Number for debug? (1997) Integration? (1999)