[Listfiles] vs Netfinder
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 10914
interpreted = N
texte = Useage question, not a bugSetting up a download directory and testing Webcatalog vs using latestNetfinder. IE: the fewer .acgi's/plug-ins the less chance of crashes: )Besides doing a [lookup] based on the file name into a data base can allowme to give a better description of the file then with netfinder. And Ireally miss my [includes] using netfinder :)The question is if I use the [fullpath] context tag the downloaded filename looks like this *dltest*ec-296.zip on my hard drive. Using a defindedfull path in html and then using [filename] the downloaded file name ondisk looks like this ec-296.zip (no *'s or long file name) Looking at thedocs on [listfiles] it reads.You may specify an absolute or relative path to the folder, and the foldername itself may be a WebCatalog [xxx] tag.Looking at this line I could see how I could put this all in a data baseand access various folders from a search.The above file is a folder named dltest on my root. And placing the mouseover the link it shows up as ftp://www.panavise.com/:dltest:ec-296.zip. Iassume those : get converted to *'s. in some hex or ask-key conversion.If I have to use just the [filename] vs using the [fullpath] so as not tomess up people on win3.1 when they download so be it. But was looking overthe [xxx] tags looking for something to strip down to just the file name ondisk. Using
[filename] gave thesame results as using the [fullpath] with or without using [url][/url].Before I go nuts and create a series of download directories and so forthwant to make sure I didn't miss something in the docs.TIAPS: You people using netfinder and very large files like we do (1.8 megsfor the one above) think about giving estimated download times[math][size]/whatever[/math] for your 28.8 dial up people. Real nice touchI think. The more I use Webcatalog and get to know it the more I loveit!!!!! Thousand and one uses only limited by your imagination :)===============================================Gary Richter PanaVise Products, Inc. 7540 Colbert Dr. Reno, Nevada 89511 Ph: 702.850.2900 Fx: 702.850.2929 Email: grichter@panavise.com http://www.panavise.com===============================================
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
|
- [Listfiles] vs Netfinder (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
|
Useage question, not a bugSetting up a download directory and testing Webcatalog vs using latestNetfinder. IE: the fewer .acgi's/plug-ins the less chance of crashes: )Besides doing a
[lookup] based on the file name into a data base can allowme to give a better description of the file then with netfinder. And Ireally miss my [includes] using netfinder :)The question is if I use the [fullpath] context tag the downloaded filename looks like this *dltest*ec-296.zip on my hard drive. Using a defindedfull path in html and then using [filename] the downloaded file name ondisk looks like this ec-296.zip (no *'s or long file name) Looking at thedocs on
[listfiles] it reads.You may specify an absolute or relative path to the folder, and the foldername itself may be a WebCatalog [xxx] tag.Looking at this line I could see how I could put this all in a data baseand access various folders from a search.The above file is a folder named dltest on my root. And placing the mouseover the link it shows up as ftp://www.panavise.com/:dltest:ec-296.zip. Iassume those : get converted to *'s. in some hex or ask-key conversion.If I have to use just the [filename] vs using the [fullpath] so as not tomess up people on win3.1 when they download so be it. But was looking overthe [xxx] tags looking for something to strip down to just the file name ondisk. Using
[filename] gave thesame results as using the [fullpath] with or without using
[url][/url].Before I go nuts and create a series of download directories and so forthwant to make sure I didn't miss something in the docs.TIAPS: You people using netfinder and very large files like we do (1.8 megsfor the one above) think about giving estimated download times
[math][size]/whatever[/math] for your 28.8 dial up people. Real nice touchI think. The more I use Webcatalog and get to know it the more I loveit!!!!! Thousand and one uses only limited by your imagination :)===============================================Gary Richter PanaVise Products, Inc. 7540 Colbert Dr. Reno, Nevada 89511 Ph: 702.850.2900 Fx: 702.850.2929 Email: grichter@panavise.com http://www.panavise.com===============================================
grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter)
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Passing WebCat data to SSL server (1997)
[WebDNA] Authentication (2009)
PIXO (1997)
Username for Admin Group (1997)
What are these prefs for? (1999)
'does not contain' operator needed ... (1997)
Shhh... (2006)
RAM problems, [appendfile] problems (1998)
Dynamic Form - Shipping Country / State/ Province (2006)
[WebDNA] Video Request: "Faces of WebDNA" (2010)
[protect] on NT? (1997)
Newbie Tax Question (1997)
[cart] Taxrate - seriously .. (2002)
Webcatalog error, Plug-in for Webstar (1996)
Tea Room trouble (1997)
Bookmarked URL with cart (1998)
Document Contains No Data! (1997)
template includes encrypted template (1999)
[Fwd: F3 database munching] (1997)
Resume Catalog ? (1997)