Re: [WebDNA] WebDNA app
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2013
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 110911
interpreted = N
texte = I vote single binary as well. Looks like there is some interest. =20 Licensing would have to still phone home I guess to verify serial number = as I think Web Catalog did. It=92s not that these machines don=92t have internet access, it=92s that = some clients don=92t want their data in the cloud, and telling them I = have to install a web server on a stand along PC, or their network = server, and then I have to deal with their network manager, it just gets = into too many issues for them, they don=92t understand, and they and = don=92t want to buy what they don=92t understand. If I say, well I just = have to install one app, it=92s easy to sell. Hey, it=92s just like = installing Office. That they understand. Ideally I would be able to install on the office file server as well. = Maybe you could sell licenses by number of users? These are small clients for me, probably the WebDNA developers with = large clients would not use this, so I think it opens up a market for = smaller businesses. If a particular application needs PHP I guess that = is a reason to say you need to have a Cloud based solution. But there = are so many things that can be done just with WebDNA alone it would = certainly open up my markets. Thanks for considering. Frank On Nov 28, 2013, at 8:29 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Hi Frank! how would you see that? a kind of =93WebDNA + built-in web = server=94 in one single binary? or a pre-built WebDNA + webserver = installation? >=20 >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Nov 28, 2013, at 5:02 PM, C. Frank Wolfe
wrote: >=20 >> Since I don=92t seem to be the only one up at this hour (4 am in = Hawaii), does anyone else think it would be a GREAT idea to have a = runtime version or WebDNA, or an App that you could run on a single = computer? I have clients that I could do so much with, but they won=92t = put data on the internet even with a secure server. >>=20 >> I supposed it would have to have a little web server built in, but it = would be so much easier than convincing some of these companies to = install ISS or whatever on their network or adding a box just for = WebDNA. A network version would be even better, and I would pay for = those each and every time and bill the client. One price for a single = computer, more for the network version. >>=20 >> Christophe/Donovan? >>=20 >> Hopefully, >>=20 >> Frank >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This = message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . = To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: = http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us >=20
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I vote single binary as well. Looks like there is some interest. =20 Licensing would have to still phone home I guess to verify serial number = as I think Web Catalog did. It=92s not that these machines don=92t have internet access, it=92s that = some clients don=92t want their data in the cloud, and telling them I = have to install a web server on a stand along PC, or their network = server, and then I have to deal with their network manager, it just gets = into too many issues for them, they don=92t understand, and they and = don=92t want to buy what they don=92t understand. If I say, well I just = have to install one app, it=92s easy to sell. Hey, it=92s just like = installing Office. That they understand. Ideally I would be able to install on the office file server as well. = Maybe you could sell licenses by number of users? These are small clients for me, probably the WebDNA developers with = large clients would not use this, so I think it opens up a market for = smaller businesses. If a particular application needs PHP I guess that = is a reason to say you need to have a Cloud based solution. But there = are so many things that can be done just with WebDNA alone it would = certainly open up my markets. Thanks for considering. Frank On Nov 28, 2013, at 8:29 PM, christophe.billiottet@webdna.us wrote: > Hi Frank! how would you see that? a kind of =93WebDNA + built-in web = server=94 in one single binary? or a pre-built WebDNA + webserver = installation? >=20 >=20 > - chris >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Nov 28, 2013, at 5:02 PM, C. Frank Wolfe wrote: >=20 >> Since I don=92t seem to be the only one up at this hour (4 am in = Hawaii), does anyone else think it would be a GREAT idea to have a = runtime version or WebDNA, or an App that you could run on a single = computer? I have clients that I could do so much with, but they won=92t = put data on the internet even with a secure server. >>=20 >> I supposed it would have to have a little web server built in, but it = would be so much easier than convincing some of these companies to = install ISS or whatever on their network or adding a box just for = WebDNA. A network version would be even better, and I would pay for = those each and every time and bill the client. One price for a single = computer, more for the network version. >>=20 >> Christophe/Donovan? >>=20 >> Hopefully, >>=20 >> Frank >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------- This = message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . = To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: = http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: = support@webdna.us >=20
frank@cwolfe.com
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Next X hits (1996)
WebDNA and SQL (2003)
Practice runs ? (1997)
webcat2b12 CGI -- Date comparisons (1997)
Robert Minor duplicate mail (1997)
searchable list archive (1997)
possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes-restated (1997)
ups quickcost [repost] (1999)
NT Woes (1997)
Semi OT: vbulletin and # viewing - how do that do that? (2003)
WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997)
Sandbox DB permissions (2005)
Upload (1998)
reading a email (2000)
Emailer Q (2002)
Sku numbers (1997)
Word search (1997)
RE: OK, here goes... (1997)
OT- OSX / OSX Server... (2004)
I'm new be kind (1997)