Re: [WebDNA] [OT] Google redirect or not
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2014
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 111048
interpreted = N
texte = This is a multi-part message in MIME format.--------------040706020702040206090304Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowedContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitI should have been more clear... I was referring specifically to 301 redirects. Thanks for the clarification.-Dan Stronghttp://www.DanStrong.comOn 1/22/2014 7:57 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote:> [snip]> As for redirects, WebDNA's [redirect] has always been hit and miss > depending on platform, so when SEO matters, I always use Apache > redirect, usually in .htaccess, but if there are a bunch then directly > in httpd.conf[snip]>> Dan, I'm not sure what you are saying here.. so I'll clarify.> Functionally, "[redirect]" in WebDNA works fine, and has on all > platforms. By default, it creates a temporary redirect, which isn't > always what you want for SEO reasons. WSC has fixed the ability to > make 301 redirects with the latest beta's in both WebDNA Server and > WebDNA FastCGI. This may not answer the OP's original question, but > just wanted to clarify.>> Donovan>>> --------------------------------------------------------- This message > is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To > unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: > http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: > support@webdna.us --------------040706020702040206090304Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I should have been more clear... I was referring specifically to 301 redirects. Thanks for the clarification.
-Dan Stronghttp://www.DanStrong.com
On 1/22/2014 7:57 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote:
[snip]
As for redirects, WebDNA's [redirect] has always been hit and miss depending on platform, so when SEO matters, I always use Apache redirect, usually in .htaccess, but if there are a bunch then directly in httpd.conf[snip]
Dan, I'm not sure what you are saying here.. so I'll clarify.
Functionally, "[redirect]" in WebDNA works fine, and has on all platforms. By default, it creates a temporary redirect, which isn't always what you want for SEO reasons. WSC has fixed the ability to make 301 redirects with the latest beta's in both WebDNA Server and WebDNA FastCGI. This may not answer the OP's original question, but just wanted to clarify.
Donovan
--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
--------------040706020702040206090304--
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.--------------040706020702040206090304Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowedContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitI should have been more clear... I was referring specifically to 301 redirects. Thanks for the clarification.-Dan Stronghttp://www.DanStrong.comOn 1/22/2014 7:57 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote:> [snip]> As for redirects, WebDNA's
[redirect] has always been hit and miss > depending on platform, so when SEO matters, I always use Apache > redirect, usually in .htaccess, but if there are a bunch then directly > in httpd.conf[snip]>> Dan, I'm not sure what you are saying here.. so I'll clarify.> Functionally, "
[redirect]" in WebDNA works fine, and has on all > platforms. By default, it creates a temporary redirect, which isn't > always what you want for SEO reasons. WSC has fixed the ability to > make 301 redirects with the latest beta's in both WebDNA Server and > WebDNA FastCGI. This may not answer the OP's original question, but > just wanted to clarify.>> Donovan>>> --------------------------------------------------------- This message > is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To > unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: > http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: > support@webdna.us --------------040706020702040206090304Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I should have been more clear... I was referring specifically to 301 redirects. Thanks for the clarification.
-Dan Stronghttp://www.DanStrong.com
On 1/22/2014 7:57 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote:
[snip]
As for redirects, WebDNA's
[redirect] has always been hit and miss depending on platform, so when SEO matters, I always use Apache redirect, usually in .htaccess, but if there are a bunch then directly in httpd.conf[snip]
Dan, I'm not sure what you are saying here.. so I'll clarify.
Functionally, "
[redirect]" in WebDNA works fine, and has on all platforms. By default, it creates a temporary redirect, which isn't always what you want for SEO reasons. WSC has fixed the ability to make 301 redirects with the latest beta's in both WebDNA Server and WebDNA FastCGI. This may not answer the OP's original question, but just wanted to clarify.
Donovan
--------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
--------------040706020702040206090304--
Dan Strong
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Not reading code (1997)
WebCat2.0 acgi vs plugin (1997)
[WebDNA] WebDNA 7.1 (2012)
PSC recommends what date format yr 2000??? (1997)
WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997)
^ in a path (2001)
WebCat & WebTen (1997)
[group] ? (1997)
Calculating multiple shipping... (1997)
HELP!! problems with e-mail from WebCAT (1998)
Problem using # in my field names ... (1998)
WebCatalog 2.0 b 15 mac (1997)
ShoppingCart removal (2002)
Can you do this??? and other stuff (1997)
Various Problems (1997)
NetForms for email (1998)
[WebDNA] Character encoding / entity database? (2009)
Another question (1997)
syntax question, not in online refernce (1997)
The max=0 issue is a bug ... (2000)