Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [dumptable]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2015
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 111931
interpreted = N
texte = I would love to have something like this. Currently if need be, I write out a= table's contents in a text variable so I can see it in a listvariables outp=ut. But it's a pita because you must construct the thing with a search, sort= it so it comes out in true order, and give it rudimentary formatting showin=g the field names.Sent from my iPad> On Jan 15, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Brian Burton
wrote:>=20> FWIW, I=E2=80=99m just making suggestions, and nothing more. The Powers Th=at Be (TPTB) can implement them, or ignore them, or print them out and use t=hem for TP if they are so inclined :)=20>=20> I try to limit my suggestions to things that I can not figure out how to i=mplement as a function. Years ago I suggested a [dumptable] tag because ther=e is no way to do anything similar in any combination of webdna tags. (Good g=od it would be so handy to [writefile file=3Ddebug][dumptable name=3Dtempthi=ngs][/writefile] while debugging pages that do complicated things to see wha=t=E2=80=99s in some rather complicated tables (tables built up by mixing the= results from several searches and appends/replaces in the table)>=20> I think it would behove the WEBDNA community to share, on the webdna site,= some of our more universal functions in a way for other developers and thos=e new to language to use after they have gotten used to the basics. These wo=uld need to be documented similar to http://dev.webdna.us/ref/index.html to b=e truly useful.=20>=20> So anyway, back to the topic, yes, I want to push the core tag set to add a= few things, that can not be implemented in any other way.=20>=20> -BBB>=20>=20>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Kenneth Grome wrot=e:>>=20>> =46rom what I understand, Brian wants his founditems contexts to>> work outside his search context, but because this is not the way>> WebDNA works he wants new tags/contexts to implement it.>>=20>> Is this correct Brian?>>=20>> Regards,>> Kenneth Grome>> WebDNA Solutions>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com>> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
|
- Re: [WebDNA] maybe silly suggestion? [dumptable] (Terry Wilson 2015)
|
I would love to have something like this. Currently if need be, I write out a= table's contents in a text variable so I can see it in a listvariables outp=ut. But it's a pita because you must construct the thing with a search, sort= it so it comes out in true order, and give it rudimentary formatting showin=g the field names.Sent from my iPad> On Jan 15, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Brian Burton wrote:>=20> FWIW, I=E2=80=99m just making suggestions, and nothing more. The Powers Th=at Be (TPTB) can implement them, or ignore them, or print them out and use t=hem for TP if they are so inclined :)=20>=20> I try to limit my suggestions to things that I can not figure out how to i=mplement as a function. Years ago I suggested a [dumptable] tag because ther=e is no way to do anything similar in any combination of webdna tags. (Good g=od it would be so handy to [writefile file=3Ddebug][dumptable name=3Dtempthi=ngs][/writefile] while debugging pages that do complicated things to see wha=t=E2=80=99s in some rather complicated tables (tables built up by mixing the= results from several searches and appends/replaces in the table)>=20> I think it would behove the WEBDNA community to share, on the webdna site,= some of our more universal functions in a way for other developers and thos=e new to language to use after they have gotten used to the basics. These wo=uld need to be documented similar to http://dev.webdna.us/ref/index.html to b=e truly useful.=20>=20> So anyway, back to the topic, yes, I want to push the core tag set to add a= few things, that can not be implemented in any other way.=20>=20> -BBB>=20>=20>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Kenneth Grome wrot=e:>>=20>> =46rom what I understand, Brian wants his founditems contexts to>> work outside his search context, but because this is not the way>> WebDNA works he wants new tags/contexts to implement it.>>=20>> Is this correct Brian?>>=20>> Regards,>> Kenneth Grome>> WebDNA Solutions>> http://www.webdnasolutions.com>> Web Database Systems and Linux Server Management>=20>=20> ---------------------------------------------------------> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to> the mailing list .> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: > archives: http://mail.webdna.us/list/talk@webdna.us> Bug Reporting: support@webdna.us
Terry Wilson
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Template Cache problem (2000)
when is date system date or order date? (1997)
One more try (1997)
search problem (2002)
FM PRO Compatibility Issue - Single Database w/o Conversions (1997)
WebCat2final1 crashes (1997)
OT: RAID Options (2004)
NT 4.02b5 Order Lineitems bug. (2000)
Searching Dates (2000)
searching by date (1998)
Secure Server (1997)
WebCatalog Started!! Now What?? (2000)
NT Email Stops Sending (2000)
[BULK] [WebDNA] WebDNA Code and HTML WYSIWYG Editors (2011)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Error Page? (1997)
calculating ShipCost depending on weight (1997)
Admin Edit prob. (1997)
Unique value creation (1999)
RE: [isfolder] and [filename] (1997)