Re: New servers and new inline cache

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1997


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 12983
interpreted = N
texte = >Speaking of cache...I have a dumb question. When I display a very large >webcatalog database over a 28.8 dial up account it pours out in excess of >3.0K per sec. The template when filled aproaches about 90K. However >images using webstar cache come in always in around the 1.4 K per sec >range. Why is this? Is there something about the webcatalog cache system >that is better then the webstar cache system? Or is there a webstar >setting that somebody thinks I should look at. Normally you would be seeing text information being compressed and getting higher K/sec xfers then an already compressed image file would give you. I can see on a 28.8k PPP connection upwards of 4.5 to 5k/sec when Claris Emailer is grabbling email off my server were as grabbing a QT movie or GIF off of anyones server I am lucky to see 2.3 to 2.6k (or slower of course). Nevin Lyne Rendered Visions--- Nevin Lyne Rendered Visions *********************************************************** In Chico, California, City Council enacted a ban on nuclear weapons, setting a $500 fine for anyone detonating one within city limits. Gotta love a College Town! ************************************************************ --- Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: New servers and new inline cache (Grant Hulbert 1997)
  2. Re: New servers and new inline cache (N. Lyne 1997)
  3. New servers and new inline cache (grichter@panavise.com (Gary Richter) 1997)
>Speaking of cache...I have a dumb question. When I display a very large >webcatalog database over a 28.8 dial up account it pours out in excess of >3.0K per sec. The template when filled aproaches about 90K. However >images using webstar cache come in always in around the 1.4 K per sec >range. Why is this? Is there something about the webcatalog cache system >that is better then the webstar cache system? Or is there a webstar >setting that somebody thinks I should look at. Normally you would be seeing text information being compressed and getting higher K/sec xfers then an already compressed image file would give you. I can see on a 28.8k PPP connection upwards of 4.5 to 5k/sec when Claris Emailer is grabbling email off my server were as grabbing a QT movie or GIF off of anyones server I am lucky to see 2.3 to 2.6k (or slower of course). Nevin Lyne Rendered Visions--- Nevin Lyne Rendered Visions *********************************************************** In Chico, California, City Council enacted a ban on nuclear weapons, setting a $500 fine for anyone detonating one within city limits. Gotta love a College Town! ************************************************************ --- N. Lyne

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

send mail problem? (1997) [WebDNA] PROBLEM WITH [SQL] (2009) Emailer setup (1997) [OT] SQL and Crackers (2000) Updating Prices in Online Database (1999) What am I missing (1997) WCS Newbie question (1997) Using WC for Bulk Emailings (1997) Range in [showif] (2000) [WebDNA] Should I be able to use [setmimeheader name=Content-Type ? (2018) service stop and restart (1997) A quickie question (1997) Removing a character (2000) problems with 2 tags (1997) Modifying order output (1997) [HIDEIF] inside [FOUNDITEM] (1997) authorizenet and netscape (2002) Multiple security dbs (1997) country of origin from IPADDRESS??? (2001) Great product and great job ! (1997)