numero = 13141
interpreted = N
texte = >Ken: > >You can do this! However, you need to use the group concept. Basically, >create a group with one field in it: date. Search that group field in one >way. Create a second group field with the date field as well and search it >the second way. That scenario was one of the reasons for the group variable. When creating a group field, I have to do something like this:But when I designate that new field in other parts of the code, do I use group1 or group1field as the proper string for the name of that field? In other words, which of the following tags is correct:(1) (2) Sincerely, Ken Grome WebDNA Solutions http://www.hui.net/dna/webdna.html
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>Ken: > >You can do this! However, you need to use the group concept. Basically, >create a group with one field in it: date. Search that group field in one >way. Create a second group field with the date field as well and search it >the second way. That scenario was one of the reasons for the group variable. When creating a group field, I have to do something like this:But when I designate that new field in other parts of the code, do I use group1 or group1field as the proper string for the name of that field? In other words, which of the following tags is correct:(1) [date]>(2) [date]>Sincerely, Ken Grome WebDNA Solutions http://www.hui.net/dna/webdna.html
Kenneth Grome
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...