Re: More DateMath problems
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1997
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 13770
interpreted = N
texte = I see what's happening and can understand how it might look like a bug, butI don't think it is. Here's why. The code in WebCatalog sees the 0000 forthe year and/or the 00 for the day and assumes the date in question isbeing added or subtracted to another date. When this occurs, it does it ona field by field basis so 1 month is either added or subtracted to theother date. This is different than converting the date to the number ofdays since X and adding or subtracting that. If you were to do that, thenyou would add a fixed number of days, 31 lets say, and the resulting datewould not be the same as adding 1 month (sometimes 31 days is a month,sometimes it is a month and a day, sometimes it's a month and 3 days). So,in the example below, the date is being treated as a date (not somethingadded or subtracted). Here's what WebCatalog thinks: The date is 1 dayless that 1/1/0000, which is 12/31/-1. Thus the month is 12. The easy fixis to use 01 instead of 00 so the dummy date is always valid. I hope thishelps.John.>The code:>[FORMAT Days_to_Date %m][MATH]{1/00/0000}[/MATH][/FORMAT]>[FORMAT Days_to_Date %m][MATH]{2/00/0000}[/MATH][/FORMAT]>[FORMAT Days_to_Date %m][MATH]{3/00/0000}[/MATH][/FORMAT]>[FORMAT Days_to_Date %m][MATH]{4/00/0000}[/MATH][/FORMAT]>[FORMAT Days_to_Date %m][MATH]{5/00/0000}[/MATH][/FORMAT]>>Returns:>12>01>02>03>04John A. Hill Pacific Coast Software11770 Bernardo Plaza Ct. #453 * Web tools for Macintosh and WinNT *San Diego, CA 92128 http://www.smithmicro.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
I see what's happening and can understand how it might look like a bug, butI don't think it is. Here's why. The code in WebCatalog sees the 0000 forthe year and/or the 00 for the day and assumes the date in question isbeing added or subtracted to another date. When this occurs, it does it ona field by field basis so 1 month is either added or subtracted to theother date. This is different than converting the date to the number ofdays since X and adding or subtracting that. If you were to do that, thenyou would add a fixed number of days, 31 lets say, and the resulting datewould not be the same as adding 1 month (sometimes 31 days is a month,sometimes it is a month and a day, sometimes it's a month and 3 days). So,in the example below, the date is being treated as a date (not somethingadded or subtracted). Here's what WebCatalog thinks: The date is 1 dayless that 1/1/0000, which is 12/31/-1. Thus the month is 12. The easy fixis to use 01 instead of 00 so the dummy date is always valid. I hope thishelps.John.>The code:>[FORMAT Days_to_Date %m]
[math]{1/00/0000}[/MATH][/FORMAT]>[FORMAT Days_to_Date %m]
[math]{2/00/0000}[/MATH][/FORMAT]>[FORMAT Days_to_Date %m]
[math]{3/00/0000}[/MATH][/FORMAT]>[FORMAT Days_to_Date %m]
[math]{4/00/0000}[/MATH][/FORMAT]>[FORMAT Days_to_Date %m]
[math]{5/00/0000}[/MATH][/FORMAT]>>Returns:>12>01>02>03>04John A. Hill Pacific Coast Software11770 Bernardo Plaza Ct. #453 * Web tools for Macintosh and WinNT *San Diego, CA 92128 http://www.smithmicro.com
John Hill
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Cart -> Date and Time (2004)
Error:Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
[shownext] and descending order (1997)
Signal Raised Error (1997)
Dynamic Pop Up Menus with Record Value Selected (1998)
form data submission gets truncated (1997)
Reversed words (1997)
Just a thought (1998)
RE: Can a database get stomped by simultaneous access? (1997)
displaying New products (Yikes! it's Fixed!) (1997)
Secure server question (1997)
printing twice? and fix (1997)
[cart] (1998)
Re[2]: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Integration with SQL (1997)
Building Calendars (1997)
4.51 Triggers (2003)
Max Record length restated as maybe bug (1997)
date tag not interpreted (2000)
FTP and [shell] (2003)