Re: Include vs. lookup?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 16021
interpreted = N
texte = At 09:59 AM 2/15/98, Kenneth Grome wrote: >Since an [include] has to hit the disk to see if the file's been changed since the last time it was loaded into WebCat's RAM cache, but a [lookup] doesn't have to hit the disk first, I think a [lookup] will be faster than an [include] most of the time, is this correct?How does this work? For ALL includes, do the files get stored in RAM?Aloha, Olin
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
At 09:59 AM 2/15/98, Kenneth Grome wrote: >Since an
[include] has to hit the disk to see if the file's been changed since the last time it was loaded into WebCat's RAM cache, but a
[lookup] doesn't have to hit the disk first, I think a
[lookup] will be faster than an
[include] most of the time, is this correct?How does this work? For ALL includes, do the files get stored in RAM?Aloha, Olin
Olin Lagon
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Num Sort Descending (2004)
URGENT: NO BUG, woFIELDdata & FIELDword=ww (2002)
Code database (1998)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [shownext method=post] ??? (1997)
different show next (1997)
Another Excel Problem (2003)
Snake Bites (1997)
Error:Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
Been meaning to ask... (1997)
Problems searching from a FORM (1997)
emailer (1997)
WebCatalog NT beta 18 now available (1997)
Great product and great job ! (1997)
Practice runs ? (1997)
WebCat2 - many [carts] on one template page? (1997)
OT Weird Messenger Service message (2002)
RE: E-mailer error codes (1997)
PIXO support (1997)
[protect] on NT? (1997)
CERT Advisory on malicious scripts (2000)