Re: Code database
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 16252
interpreted = N
texte = At 0:06 Uhr 26.02.1998, Brian B. Burton wrote:>As per my previous post, I am willing (and probably going to start doing) an>online database of code snippets and general hints for webcatalog...>I'm thinking that this site will have fields for:>SKU (have to have some easy way to identify the record)>Date Submitted>Author>Topic or Category>The Code>Min Version of WebCat needed to run this Code>>Am I missing Any fields?I would like to see a searchable textual description of what the code does.>Should this databses be moderated, with someone else testing submitted code>before it is posted to the website? Or will everybody post working code?Moderated should not be necessary since there is still the WebCat mailinglist. And testing - hm - a lot of unpayed work, isn't it?But I wonder how you plan to organize the categories and if any developerwill post his code snippet into the right one...>I don't>want webcatalog to interpret the code on the fly (wouldn't it be ironic if I>had to do this with Filemaker, just to preserve the code?):-)Before you go for a filemaker solution we could help you with a standalone4D database.We are 4D developer and rather new at WebCat but already fascinated. If youlike it we are willing to set up a european mirror of your WebCat site herein vienna.Peter______________Peter OstryVienna/Austriapo@ostry.comwww.ostry.com
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
At 0:06 Uhr 26.02.1998, Brian B. Burton wrote:>As per my previous post, I am willing (and probably going to start doing) an>online database of code snippets and general hints for webcatalog...>I'm thinking that this site will have fields for:>SKU (have to have some easy way to identify the record)>Date Submitted>Author>Topic or Category>The Code>Min Version of WebCat needed to run this Code>>Am I missing Any fields?I would like to see a searchable textual description of what the code does.>Should this databses be moderated, with someone else testing submitted code>before it is posted to the website? Or will everybody post working code?Moderated should not be necessary since there is still the WebCat mailinglist. And testing - hm - a lot of unpayed work, isn't it?But I wonder how you plan to organize the categories and if any developerwill post his code snippet into the right one...>I don't>want webcatalog to interpret the code on the fly (wouldn't it be ironic if I>had to do this with Filemaker, just to preserve the code?):-)Before you go for a filemaker solution we could help you with a standalone4D database.We are 4D developer and rather new at WebCat but already fascinated. If youlike it we are willing to set up a european mirror of your WebCat site herein vienna.Peter______________Peter OstryVienna/Austriapo@ostry.comwww.ostry.com
Peter Ostry
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Development terminated. (1998)
[WebDNA] Test - Please ignore (2014)
Error -108 (1997)
different ship dates and shopping carts -- how to? (1997)
WebCat editing, SiteGuard WAS:SiteAssociative lookup style? (1997)
WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997)
WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996)
show all problem (1997)
WILDWEBCAT encrypt.tpl submission (1998)
The word TYPE in search contexts and fields (1998)
WebCatalog Hosting (1996)
[WebDNA] WebDNA DE purchase (2008)
nesting limits? (1998)
Re1000001: Setting up shop (1997)
CommandSecurity? (1997)
GoLive CyberStudio 1.0.1 (1997)
Quit revisited (1997)
Special characters in field names (1998)
Re:no [search] with NT (1997)
WebCat2b13MacPlugIn - [showif][search][/showif] (1997)