Re: followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 16776
interpreted = N
texte = At 8:45 PM -0800 3/26/98, Dale LaFountain wrote: >As you can see, WS 2.1 is still faster than 3.0 here, but the margin is >much closer now. Removing Webcatalog from the equation had a HUGE effect >on performance (much more than I expected), and this page only contained >minimal date math and a couple lookups. I ran a few other tests with >various files and the results looked similar, so I won't bore you with >those details.One thing to consider is that several of the Plug-Ins included with WebSTAR 3.0 run in the W*API's Filter role. Thus every request is sent through those Plug-Ins. If you are not using the Filter Plug-Ins you may want to remove them as they will give you a slight speed increase. If I recall correctly, all of the following WebSTAR 3.0 Plug-Ins run in the role of a Filter; WebSTAR Byte Server, WebSTAR Directory Indexer, WebSTAR Java Servlet Runner, WebSTAR WebObjects Adaptor.I hope this helps.================================================================ Eric Zelenka mailto:eric@smithmicro.com WebSTAR Product Manager http://www.smithmicro.com/ StarNine Inc. http://eric.smithmicro.com/ The Future Is In Beta Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed (Grant Hulbert 1998)
  2. Re: followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed (Eric Zelenka 1998)
  3. followup to ws3 vs ws2.1 speed (Dale LaFountain 1998)
At 8:45 PM -0800 3/26/98, Dale LaFountain wrote: >As you can see, WS 2.1 is still faster than 3.0 here, but the margin is >much closer now. Removing Webcatalog from the equation had a HUGE effect >on performance (much more than I expected), and this page only contained >minimal date math and a couple lookups. I ran a few other tests with >various files and the results looked similar, so I won't bore you with >those details.One thing to consider is that several of the Plug-Ins included with WebSTAR 3.0 run in the W*API's Filter role. Thus every request is sent through those Plug-Ins. If you are not using the Filter Plug-Ins you may want to remove them as they will give you a slight speed increase. If I recall correctly, all of the following WebSTAR 3.0 Plug-Ins run in the role of a Filter; WebSTAR Byte Server, WebSTAR Directory Indexer, WebSTAR Java Servlet Runner, WebSTAR WebObjects Adaptor.I hope this helps.================================================================ Eric Zelenka mailto:eric@smithmicro.com WebSTAR Product Manager http://www.smithmicro.com/ StarNine Inc. http://eric.smithmicro.com/ The Future Is In Beta Eric Zelenka

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

displaying New products (using [date]) (1997) [/application] error? (1997) UnitShopCost (2007) [shownext] and descending order (1997) Giving out error pages (1997) [isfile] ? (1997) WebMerchant? (1998) Variable Prices (1998) [shownext] support - MacOS (1997) multiple front end servers (2004) Using [sendmail] for mass mailings (2001) [REPLACE] inside [FOUNDITEMS] (1998) Problems reading files created by WC (1997) Menu Syntax on Edit/Add templates (1998) Major bug report on rootbeer (1997) Nested vs conditional (1997) OT: JavaScript question (2001) CC Merchant suggestions?? (1997) Replace and Autonumber (2003) WebSTAR 2.1 freezes my Mac (1997)