Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 18920
interpreted = N
texte = At 5:37 PM 7/15/98, de Saint Phalle, Andre wrote: >Any comments about the recent press stating that WebTEN trounces WebSTAR >even at low volumes?WebTen is a bit faster then WebSTAR when using their custom TCP stack, however you loose the ease of use WebSTAR is known for. The real question is, do you need that extra speed? The extra requests per second will do you no good unless you have enough bandwidth to handle the load. According to the PC Magazine WebSTAR 3.0 can handle nearly 25,000,000 WebBench 2.0 connections a day on a G3 server. The WebBench 2.0 tests are designed to be real world files varying in size from about 2K to over 10K.If you need any more speed then that, you should consider setting up another WebSTAR server and implementing a Load Balancing/Fault Tolerance system on your server. See . ================================================================ Eric Zelenka mailto:eric@smithmicro.com WebSTAR Product Manager http://www.smithmicro.com/ StarNine Inc. http://eric.smithmicro.com/ Hits Happen - WebSTAR Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: WebTEN vs webSTARtopic (Rob Marquardt 1998)
  2. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Brian B. Burton 1998)
  3. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  4. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  5. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Brian B. Burton 1998)
  6. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Peter Ostry 1998)
  7. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR (Eric Zelenka 1998)
  8. Re: WebTEN vs webSTAR have you seen this? (Gary Richter 1998)
  9. Re: WebTEN vs webSTARtopic (Gary Richter 1998)
  10. WebTEN vs webSTAR (andre@adsp.com (de Saint Phalle, Andre) 1998)
At 5:37 PM 7/15/98, de Saint Phalle, Andre wrote: >Any comments about the recent press stating that WebTEN trounces WebSTAR >even at low volumes?WebTen is a bit faster then WebSTAR when using their custom TCP stack, however you loose the ease of use WebSTAR is known for. The real question is, do you need that extra speed? The extra requests per second will do you no good unless you have enough bandwidth to handle the load. According to the PC Magazine WebSTAR 3.0 can handle nearly 25,000,000 WebBench 2.0 connections a day on a G3 server. The WebBench 2.0 tests are designed to be real world files varying in size from about 2K to over 10K.If you need any more speed then that, you should consider setting up another WebSTAR server and implementing a Load Balancing/Fault Tolerance system on your server. See . ================================================================ Eric Zelenka mailto:eric@smithmicro.com WebSTAR Product Manager http://www.smithmicro.com/ StarNine Inc. http://eric.smithmicro.com/ Hits Happen - WebSTAR Eric Zelenka

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Page Counters? (1997) Summing fields (1997) Re:Emailer and encryption (1997) Out of the woodwork (2007) WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997) [WebDNA] LinkedIn Network (2008) Re:Call For Entry: Third Annual Business on The Internet (BOTI) Awards (1999) Re[2]: 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Support ?? (1997) Question about replacing words (1998) [WebDNA]