RE: speed of TCPConnect?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 1998
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 21435
interpreted = N
texte = Thanks Grant,I'll optimize my application to minimize the connections using text variables and some local caching. On the first couple of connections, it's still fast!Aloha, Olin> -----Original Message----- > From: Grant Hulbert [mailto:granth@smithmicro.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 12:57 PM > To: WebDNA-Talk@smithmicro.com > Subject: Re: speed of TCPConnect? > > > >Building a system where I want to connect some webcat pages to a Java > >Application Server which ties into an Oracle database. > TCPConnect works like > >a charm ;) However, what happens when I start embedding about a dozen > >TCPConnect calls? I remember a thread once saying that the [dos] context > >took about 1/3 of a second to execute. Has tht TCPConnect service been > >timed? > > It's not optimized for speed (although it's much faster than DOS). What's > fastest is if you carry on a conversation with a bunch of > [TCPSend]s inside > a single [TCPConnect]. But bringing up and tearing down a TCP connection > is inherently slow on any OS. > > Right now it's sort of at the beginning stages where it's just a > 'yeah, you > can do that' feature. >
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Thanks Grant,I'll optimize my application to minimize the connections using text variables and some local caching. On the first couple of connections, it's still fast!Aloha, Olin> -----Original Message----- > From: Grant Hulbert [mailto:granth@smithmicro.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 12:57 PM > To: WebDNA-Talk@smithmicro.com > Subject: Re: speed of TCPConnect? > > > >Building a system where I want to connect some webcat pages to a Java > >Application Server which ties into an Oracle database. > TCPConnect works like > >a charm ;) However, what happens when I start embedding about a dozen > >TCPConnect calls? I remember a thread once saying that the
[DOS] context > >took about 1/3 of a second to execute. Has tht TCPConnect service been > >timed? > > It's not optimized for speed (although it's much faster than DOS). What's > fastest is if you carry on a conversation with a bunch of >
[tcpsend]s inside > a single
[tcpconnect]. But bringing up and tearing down a TCP connection > is inherently slow on any OS. > > Right now it's sort of at the beginning stages where it's just a > 'yeah, you > can do that' feature. >
Olin Lagon
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Generating Report Totals (1997)
Problem with 2.1b3 (1997)
Windows XP + Apache 2.0 + WebDNA (2002)
Use of & in text areas.... (1998)
searching for a variable range with in a found set (2002)
FREE Stuff .. (2003)
A Global Variable (1997)
problem: type 2 errors (1997)
problems with WebCat-Plugin ()
listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997)
[ShowNext] (1997)
WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997)
[recordrank]? (2000)
Sort Issue? (2000)
WebCat2 - [format thousands] (1997)
Suffix Mapping (1998)
WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997)
Execute Applescript (1997)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - [protect] (1997)
How To question on setting up downloads (1997)