Re: log files

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998

It keeps the original formatting. numero = 21822
interpreted = N
texte = >>In the real world is the slowdown of having every page do an append>>file to a log file a meaningful number. Is the slowdown 2 seconds, .1 sec,>>.01 sec. Is anyone using a similar solution.>>Use this code to see for yourself:>>[ElapsedTime]> [AppendFile]...[/AppendFile]>[/ElapsedTime]This code won't tell you how long it takes to perform the [appendfile]. The syntax is wrong because ElapsedTime is a global tag, not a context. Here's what the HTML docs say:Putting [ELAPSEDTIME] in your template will display the elapsed time (in 60ths of a second) since the beginning of processing this page. Put one at the top of a page, and another at the bottom to see how long the entire page takes to process (subtract the 2 numbers to get the answer).Therefore, the following example would be one method for getting an approximation of the time required to perform an [appendfile]:[math show=f]startTime=[elapsedtime][/math][AppendFile]...[/AppendFile]AppendFile Ticks = [math][elapsedtime]-startTIme[/math]Although this should give you a rough estimate, you might be better off to use two [elapsedtime] tags without the math contexts, and doing the math yourself:[elapsedtime][AppendFile]...[/AppendFile][elapsedtime]... because there's a possibility that simply having webcat perform the math calculations will add an extra tick or two to the results (but I doubt it) ... :)Sincerely,Ken Grome808-737-6499WebDNA Solutionsmailto:ken@webdna.nethttp://www.webdna.net Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

Re: OT: Log Files ( Alain Russell 2003)
Re: OT: Log Files ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2003)
Re: OT: Log Files ( Paul Willis 2003)
Re: OT: Log Files ( John Peacock 2003)
OT: Log Files ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2003)
Re: log files (Kenneth Grome 1998)
Re: log files (John W 1998)
Re: log files (charles kline 1998)
Re: log files (Dave MacLeay 1998)
log files (Charlie Romero 1998)
Re: Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (Paul Uttermohlen 1997)
Re: Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (Kenneth Grome 1997)
Re: Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (Wendell B. Kozak 1997)
Re: Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (Bob Minor 1997)
Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (Dale Stokdyk 1997)

>>In the real world is the slowdown of having every page do an append>>file to a log file a meaningful number. Is the slowdown 2 seconds, .1 sec,>>.01 sec. Is anyone using a similar solution.>>Use this code to see for yourself:>>[elapsedtime]> [appendfile]...[/AppendFile]>[/ElapsedTime]This code won't tell you how long it takes to perform the [appendfile]. The syntax is wrong because ElapsedTime is a global tag, not a context. Here's what the HTML docs say:Putting [elapsedtime] in your template will display the elapsed time (in 60ths of a second) since the beginning of processing this page. Put one at the top of a page, and another at the bottom to see how long the entire page takes to process (subtract the 2 numbers to get the answer).Therefore, the following example would be one method for getting an approximation of the time required to perform an [appendfile]:[math show=f]startTime=[elapsedtime][/math][appendfile]...[/AppendFile]AppendFile Ticks = [math][elapsedtime]-startTIme[/math]Although this should give you a rough estimate, you might be better off to use two [elapsedtime] tags without the math contexts, and doing the math yourself:[elapsedtime][appendfile]...[/AppendFile][elapsedtime]... because there's a possibility that simply having webcat perform the math calculations will add an extra tick or two to the results (but I doubt it) ... :)Sincerely,Ken Grome808-737-6499WebDNA Solutionsmailto:ken@webdna.nethttp://www.webdna.net Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Re: log files

1998

Top Articles:

Related Readings: