Re: log files

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1998


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 21822
interpreted = N
texte = >>In the real world is the slowdown of having every page do an append >>file to a log file a meaningful number. Is the slowdown 2 seconds, .1 sec, >>.01 sec. Is anyone using a similar solution. > >Use this code to see for yourself: > >[ElapsedTime] > [AppendFile]...[/AppendFile] >[/ElapsedTime]This code won't tell you how long it takes to perform the [appendfile]. The syntax is wrong because ElapsedTime is a global tag, not a context. Here's what the HTML docs say:Putting [ELAPSEDTIME] in your template will display the elapsed time (in 60ths of a second) since the beginning of processing this page. Put one at the top of a page, and another at the bottom to see how long the entire page takes to process (subtract the 2 numbers to get the answer).Therefore, the following example would be one method for getting an approximation of the time required to perform an [appendfile]:[math show=f]startTime=[elapsedtime][/math] [AppendFile]...[/AppendFile] AppendFile Ticks = [math][elapsedtime]-startTIme[/math]Although this should give you a rough estimate, you might be better off to use two [elapsedtime] tags without the math contexts, and doing the math yourself:[elapsedtime] [AppendFile]...[/AppendFile] [elapsedtime]... because there's a possibility that simply having webcat perform the math calculations will add an extra tick or two to the results (but I doubt it) ... :)Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: OT: Log Files ( Alain Russell 2003)
  2. Re: OT: Log Files ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2003)
  3. Re: OT: Log Files ( Paul Willis 2003)
  4. Re: OT: Log Files ( John Peacock 2003)
  5. OT: Log Files ( "Nitai @ ComputerOil" 2003)
  6. Re: log files (Kenneth Grome 1998)
  7. Re: log files (John W 1998)
  8. Re: log files (charles kline 1998)
  9. Re: log files (Dave MacLeay 1998)
  10. log files (Charlie Romero 1998)
  11. Re: Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (Paul Uttermohlen 1997)
  12. Re: Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (Kenneth Grome 1997)
  13. Re: Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (Wendell B. Kozak 1997)
  14. Re: Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (Bob Minor 1997)
  15. Umm...about those log files? (Off Topic) (Dale Stokdyk 1997)
>>In the real world is the slowdown of having every page do an append >>file to a log file a meaningful number. Is the slowdown 2 seconds, .1 sec, >>.01 sec. Is anyone using a similar solution. > >Use this code to see for yourself: > >[elapsedtime] > [appendfile]...[/AppendFile] >[/ElapsedTime]This code won't tell you how long it takes to perform the [appendfile]. The syntax is wrong because ElapsedTime is a global tag, not a context. Here's what the HTML docs say:Putting [elapsedtime] in your template will display the elapsed time (in 60ths of a second) since the beginning of processing this page. Put one at the top of a page, and another at the bottom to see how long the entire page takes to process (subtract the 2 numbers to get the answer).Therefore, the following example would be one method for getting an approximation of the time required to perform an [appendfile]:[math show=f]startTime=[elapsedtime][/math] [appendfile]...[/AppendFile] AppendFile Ticks = [math][elapsedtime]-startTIme[/math]Although this should give you a rough estimate, you might be better off to use two [elapsedtime] tags without the math contexts, and doing the math yourself:[elapsedtime] [appendfile]...[/AppendFile] [elapsedtime]... because there's a possibility that simply having webcat perform the math calculations will add an extra tick or two to the results (but I doubt it) ... :)Sincerely, Ken Grome 808-737-6499 WebDNA Solutions mailto:ken@webdna.net http://www.webdna.net Kenneth Grome

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

whole word search bringing irrelevant results.. (2000) Math with Time (1997) off topic fetch vs PCS photomaster (1997) all records returned. (1997) Signal Raised Error (Part II) (1997) suffix mapping for NT? (1997) Emailer (WebCat2) (1997) WebCat2 - storing unformatted date data? (1997) WebDNA Docs (2003) [WebDNA] Conditional Javascript and WebDNA (2009) Webcat/Webmerchant part II (1998) Design Help Needed (1998) Before I Can Begin . . . (1998) Mystery File (2005) [/application] error? (1997) Emailer Set Up (1997) Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) [format xs] freeze (1997) CVS Files for databases (2000) flushdatabases (1997)