RE: redirect with more than 256 characters

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

1999


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 22542
interpreted = N
texte = As i remember too, the post arguements wont go along through a redirect./Martin >>>I got more than 256 to pass with redirect, but after a certainly number it >>>fails. Doesn't using TCPConnect embedded the results of that page to the >>>current template? I would like to move to a whole new template after my >>>error checking has passed. >> >>I would suggest you to not use [REDIRECT], use [INCLUDE] instead - if all >>the pages involved are located on the same server. >> >>(BTW: I would suspect any Variables set by the latest POST action are still >>availible on the page you redirect your visitor to - but not any [MATH] or >>[TEXT] variables. So a hack would be to pass just those variables.) > >I don't think the POST variables are passed thru on a [redirect]. It seems >I remember this from my testing a long time ago, but I could be mistaken. >Has anyone tested this recently? > >Sincerely, >Ken Grome >808-737-6499 >WebDNA Solutions >mailto:ken@webdna.net >http://www.webdna.net Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Christer Olsson 1999)
  2. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Martin Bech 1999)
  3. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  4. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Christer Olsson 1999)
  5. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Olin Lagon 1999)
  6. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Kenneth Grome 1999)
  7. RE: redirect with more than 256 characters (Olin Lagon 1999)
  8. Re: redirect with more than 256 characters (Kenneth Grome 1999)
As i remember too, the post arguements wont go along through a redirect./Martin >>>I got more than 256 to pass with redirect, but after a certainly number it >>>fails. Doesn't using TCPConnect embedded the results of that page to the >>>current template? I would like to move to a whole new template after my >>>error checking has passed. >> >>I would suggest you to not use [redirect], use [include] instead - if all >>the pages involved are located on the same server. >> >>(BTW: I would suspect any Variables set by the latest POST action are still >>availible on the page you redirect your visitor to - but not any [math] or >>[text] variables. So a hack would be to pass just those variables.) > >I don't think the POST variables are passed thru on a [redirect]. It seems >I remember this from my testing a long time ago, but I could be mistaken. >Has anyone tested this recently? > >Sincerely, >Ken Grome >808-737-6499 >WebDNA Solutions >mailto:ken@webdna.net >http://www.webdna.net Martin Bech

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) Separate SSL Server (1997) Upgrade to web DNA6.0 problem (2004) RE: ANother SHOWIF problem (1997) Missing from Docs [folderName] (1997) [WebDNA] Help with STMP Setup using Authentication with Google Apps in WebDNA (2016) Latest compatible Apache (2006) OT: Typhoon (1998) SUMM=T does not summarize by the sort parameters ... (2003) Still having install problems (2000) Forum - Test Request (2005) Searchable list mail via wwebcat (1998) [convertchars] (2000) list items (1998) Multiple Attachments with Sendmail (2004) Merging databases (1997) Major Security Hole (1998) list items (1998) Up and running ... at last !! (1997) [WriteFile] problems (1997)