Re: Database Locking?!?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 26127
interpreted = N
texte = >This has been discussed before and I'm bringing it up again...>>Database locking.>Let me make a few quick assumptions for my problem to prevent solutions>that I can't use:>1. I MUST use my sequential number solution as the record ID.>2. Refer to #1>3. I can't really reduce the size of the database for other reasons.>>My question is, I need to do database locking somehow. If I do my>search INSIDE of the append, will that lock access to the database until>the append completes, and therefore solve my duplicate ID problem?>>If not, any other ideas on this (but sticking to the top 3 assumptions)?Use a second database that only has the highest number in it. So for each record in the other db get the number, put it in a variable then add one to it and append it back. Use a lookup to get the number the first time and a replace to append the incremented number. This would be a very fast way to take care of it.John Jakovich | ==Ecommerce and Beyond==Smith Micro Software Inc. | http://www.smithmicro.com-------------------------------------------------------------Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server.To end your Mail problems go to
.This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>This has been discussed before and I'm bringing it up again...>>Database locking.>Let me make a few quick assumptions for my problem to prevent solutions>that I can't use:>1. I MUST use my sequential number solution as the record ID.>2. Refer to #1>3. I can't really reduce the size of the database for other reasons.>>My question is, I need to do database locking somehow. If I do my>search INSIDE of the append, will that lock access to the database until>the append completes, and therefore solve my duplicate ID problem?>>If not, any other ideas on this (but sticking to the top 3 assumptions)?Use a second database that only has the highest number in it. So for each record in the other db get the number, put it in a variable then add one to it and append it back. Use a lookup to get the number the first time and a replace to append the incremented number. This would be a very fast way to take care of it.John Jakovich | ==Ecommerce and Beyond==Smith Micro Software Inc. | http://www.smithmicro.com-------------------------------------------------------------Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server.To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Smith Micro Support
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
really wierd date stuff on NT (1997)
Grouping search fields, etc. (1997)
How do I get Google to crawl a WebCat site? (2003)
Max Record length restated as maybe bug (1997)
Max Record length restated as maybe bug (1997)
Misc Stuff That Might Help (1997)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
WebDNA 6 (2004)
RE: [WebDNA] Bug in WebDNA or in my brain? (2013)
Resume Catalog ? (1997)
Shopping Cart Deletion (2000)
any suggestions for creating a multi-lingual site? (1999)
Hyperboard/bulletin board available (1998)
Apache/MySQL Authentication (2006)
thread7715.debug (1999)
Funny Math (2000)
[WebDNA] Fails from http:// but works from file:/// (2009)
WebCat2 Append problem (B14Macacgi) (1997)
Is there a way to just get to the last record in the database? (1997)
LOG IN LOG OUT (1997)