Re: nslookup <for Bob>

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2000


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 27015
interpreted = N
texte = > Uh, was that directed at Bob or me? and why? Doing a tcconnect to a > linux box, sending a username and password and retrieving the result of > a nslookupdoesn't seem to freeking difficult. I did a whois lookup with > netevents, doesn't *seem* much harder.Talking to your DNS would be much faster and more efficient.On an NT box you can also the ping command:[dos]ping -a -n 1 -w 1 [IPToResolve][/dos]It should give you the domain name in a string that you can work on with the [middle] context.Kinda slow, though.I spend some time reading the RFCs concerning DNS and decided: either to spend a lot of time programming this stuff myself (and a lot of time understand the system) or would wait for SM to come with their own solution.Will wait for WC 4.0 and use my [dos]ping... solution until then. ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: nslookup (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  2. Re: nslookup (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  3. Re: nslookup (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  4. Re: nslookup (Bob Minor 2000)
  5. Re: nslookup (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  6. Re: nslookup (Aaron Lynch 2000)
  7. Re: nslookup (Bob Minor 2000)
  8. Re: nslookup (Nicolas Verhaeghe 2000)
  9. nslookup (Aaron Lynch 2000)
> Uh, was that directed at Bob or me? and why? Doing a tcconnect to a > linux box, sending a username and password and retrieving the result of > a nslookupdoesn't seem to freeking difficult. I did a whois lookup with > netevents, doesn't *seem* much harder.Talking to your DNS would be much faster and more efficient.On an NT box you can also the ping command:[DOS]ping -a -n 1 -w 1 [IPToResolve][/dos]It should give you the domain name in a string that you can work on with the [middle] context.Kinda slow, though.I spend some time reading the RFCs concerning DNS and decided: either to spend a lot of time programming this stuff myself (and a lot of time understand the system) or would wait for SM to come with their own solution.Will wait for WC 4.0 and use my [DOS]ping... solution until then. ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Nicolas Verhaeghe

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Pacific Coast Software responsiveness (was WebMerchant - MacAuthorize) (1999) [showif]/[hideif] question (1997) 2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996) Storebuilder Seems to have just died (2003) (2000) WCS Newbie question (1997) Image browser / insert image (2006) Authenticate (1999) WC2b12: Yes, Formulas.db is for real (1997) show all problem (1997) Review comparison by PC Magazine: Open for On-line Business (1997) The old multiple selection bit (2000) Linux Segmentation Fault (2005) Searching using numbers (1998) Quit revisited (1997) Emailer (1997) Unique SKU Numbers (2000) populating a [table] (2004) New Command prefs ... (1997) Test, please ignore (2003)