Optimizing [founditems]
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 27116
interpreted = N
texte = Just curious:I state, a search can be considered as active until [/search]. So weshould keep the code within the search context as short as possible.Most responsibe for speed is:1 - The amount of code in the whole template (loading time).2 - The type of search (complex or not).3 - The amount and complexity of code within [founditems].4 - Available RAM, number and size of loaded databases.Example 1Single [founditems] and many, manystuff depending on a two-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [founditems] [showif [MyVariable]=on] ...many difficult things to do... [/showif] [showif [MyVariable]=off] ...many difficult things to do... [/showif] [/founditems][/search]---------------------------------------I do this most times and (shame) I believe it is the worst method. we haveto load one huge page first, then validate all showif's within [founditems].And showif's can get much more complex than in the example!Example 2Two [founditems] and many, manystuff depending on a two-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [showif [MyVariable]=on] [founditems] ...many difficult things to do... [/founditems] [/showif] [showif [MyVariable]=off] [founditems] ...many difficult things to do... [/founditems] [/showif][/search]---------------------------------------Overall code is equal, but less to do within [founditems]. Might fit betterfor medium size. I think about adopting this method for all rather shortstandard searches. Nonsense? Just theory?Example 3One [founditems] and different include'sdepending on a multi-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [founditems] [include result_[MyVariable].inc] [/founditems][/search]---------------------------------------5 Lines only and loading just what needed. It requires more templates, butis still maintainable.Now my question:Does example 3 give us most possible speed, or might we loose performancewhile loading files from disk?Peter-------------------------------------------------------------Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server.To end your Mail problems go to
.This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
|
- Optimizing [founditems] (Peter Ostry 2000)
|
Just curious:I state, a search can be considered as active until [/search]. So weshould keep the code within the search context as short as possible.Most responsibe for speed is:1 - The amount of code in the whole template (loading time).2 - The type of search (complex or not).3 - The amount and complexity of code within [founditems].4 - Available RAM, number and size of loaded databases.Example 1Single [founditems] and many, manystuff depending on a two-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [founditems] [showif [MyVariable]=on] ...many difficult things to do... [/showif] [showif [MyVariable]=off] ...many difficult things to do... [/showif] [/founditems][/search]---------------------------------------I do this most times and (shame) I believe it is the worst method. we haveto load one huge page first, then validate all showif's within [founditems].And showif's can get much more complex than in the example!Example 2Two [founditems] and many, manystuff depending on a two-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [showif [MyVariable]=on] [founditems] ...many difficult things to do... [/founditems] [/showif] [showif [MyVariable]=off] [founditems] ...many difficult things to do... [/founditems] [/showif][/search]---------------------------------------Overall code is equal, but less to do within [founditems]. Might fit betterfor medium size. I think about adopting this method for all rather shortstandard searches. Nonsense? Just theory?Example 3One [founditems] and different include'sdepending on a multi-state variable:---------------------------------------[search...] [founditems] [include result_[MyVariable].inc] [/founditems][/search]---------------------------------------5 Lines only and loading just what needed. It requires more templates, butis still maintainable.Now my question:Does example 3 give us most possible speed, or might we loose performancewhile loading files from disk?Peter-------------------------------------------------------------Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server.To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Peter Ostry
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Re:2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
Accepting credit cards (1997)
Bizarre behavior texta behavior (2004)
Forcing Paragraph Breaks on Results (1998)
WebCat NT v. Mac (1997)
href name= link from dynamic URL possible? (1998)
Include a big block of text (1997)
Lineitems [text*] (2004)
TCP Connect for a newbie (2002)
Problems with date math (1997)
Truncated text (2006)
What about this gremlin issue? (2000)
Time comparison question (1998)
send mail problem? (1997)
[WebDNA] Another strange WebDNA problem (2013)
Using WC for Bulk Emailings (1997)
Search-context (1999)
Using [Showif] tag. Mac (1997)
[OT] Theiving B*****ds (2004)
[orderfile] on Win2K Server (2003)