Re: Balancing randomness
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 27950
interpreted = N
texte = On 2/23/00 8:59 am, jpeacock@univpress.com so noted...>I have long suspected that the sdir=ra is having >problems with the internal classification scheme which was interfering >with the >random selection process. However, unless I am mistaken, a truly random >distribution should be flat not gaussian (bell curved). However, by using >the >random distribution to create a table which is then used to select the >records, >you were able to get a flat response rate. > >Which O/S was this testing done on? I will try it under NT and Linux for >giggles sake and see whether it looks at all different. I suspect it might, >because different O/S's provide different random functions.This was using WebCat 3.0.5b11 with WebTen 2.1.10 on MacOS 8.6. It would be interesting to see the results with NT and Linux.Rob Marquardt Designer/Resident Wirehead Toast Design800 Washington Avenue North Minneapolis MN 55401 612.330.9863 v 612.321.9424 f www.toastdesign.com ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to
.This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
On 2/23/00 8:59 am, jpeacock@univpress.com so noted...>I have long suspected that the sdir=ra is having >problems with the internal classification scheme which was interfering >with the >random selection process. However, unless I am mistaken, a truly random >distribution should be flat not gaussian (bell curved). However, by using >the >random distribution to create a table which is then used to select the >records, >you were able to get a flat response rate. > >Which O/S was this testing done on? I will try it under NT and Linux for >giggles sake and see whether it looks at all different. I suspect it might, >because different O/S's provide different random functions.This was using WebCat 3.0.5b11 with WebTen 2.1.10 on MacOS 8.6. It would be interesting to see the results with NT and Linux.Rob Marquardt Designer/Resident Wirehead Toast Design800 Washington Avenue North Minneapolis MN 55401 612.330.9863 v 612.321.9424 f www.toastdesign.com ------------------------------------------------------------- Brought to you by CommuniGate Pro - The Buzz Word Compliant Messaging Server. To end your Mail problems go to .This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
Rob Marquardt
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Mauthonly followed by mauthcapture (2002)
Electronic Delivery (1997)
Re1000002: Setting up shop (1997)
shipping calculations, lookup command (1997)
[ShowNext] feature in 2.0 (1997)
Preventing Merchant Settling ? (1997)
The future of WebCatalog is coming with 4.0... (2000)
Why doesn't it change? (1998)
RE: Explorer oddities (1997)
WebDNA to Apache RewriteMap (2005)
emailer (1997)
# fields limited? (1997)
Upload Maximum (2003)
Include Troubles (1998)
HELP WITH DATES (1997)
WebDNA Solutions ... sorry! (1997)
Nested tags count question (1997)
Tab Charactor (1997)
AUTONUMBER (2003)
setting values (1998)