Re[2]: New syntax feedback for 4.0
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 29401
interpreted = N
texte = Grant - Check out http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/ for the XHTML 1.0 specs. See especially Section 4 and Appendix C.John Peacock ____________________Reply Separator____________________ Subject: Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 Author:
Date: 3/21/00 9:10 AM>In view of the requirement under xHTML that _all_ parameters be >quoted, I think >that has to be your answer. It will not matter now, it may not matter for a >year or two, but if you are going to change it now, you might as >well do it the >right way from the outset.Yeah, that's one of our biggest design concerns, and is why we can't pick some arbitrary syntax just because it might 'look better'. Do you happen to have a URL that would talk more about this aspect?Grant Hulbert, Director of Engineering ********************************** Smith Micro, Internet Solutions Div | eCommerce (WebCatalog) 16855 West Bernardo Drive, #380 | ------------------------- San Diego, CA 92127 | Software & Site Development Main Line: (858) 675-1106 | http://www.smithmicro.com Fax: (858) 675-0372 ********************************** ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Grant - Check out http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/ for the XHTML 1.0 specs. See especially Section 4 and Appendix C.John Peacock ____________________Reply Separator____________________ Subject: Re: New syntax feedback for 4.0 Author: Date: 3/21/00 9:10 AM>In view of the requirement under xHTML that _all_ parameters be >quoted, I think >that has to be your answer. It will not matter now, it may not matter for a >year or two, but if you are going to change it now, you might as >well do it the >right way from the outset.Yeah, that's one of our biggest design concerns, and is why we can't pick some arbitrary syntax just because it might 'look better'. Do you happen to have a URL that would talk more about this aspect?Grant Hulbert, Director of Engineering ********************************** Smith Micro, Internet Solutions Div | eCommerce (WebCatalog) 16855 West Bernardo Drive, #380 | ------------------------- San Diego, CA 92127 | Software & Site Development Main Line: (858) 675-1106 | http://www.smithmicro.com Fax: (858) 675-0372 ********************************** ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to Send administrative queries to
jpeacock@univpress.com
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
[defined]ish (1997)
Variable security (2000)
[WebDNA] online.db deadlock: your current options ... (2011)
[TaxableTotal] - not working with AOL and IE (1997)
Showing unopened cart (1997)
URL for Discussion Archive (1997)
Include vs. lookup? (1998)
off topic - dna snipets (1997)
Cool! formulas (1998)
Comments in db? (1997)
Quickie question on the email templates (1997)
Big Databases (1997)
Setting up shop (1997)
[WebDNA] MD5 encryption (2011)
Wrapping text (1998)
More help for discount pricing (1998)
WebCat2 beta 11 - new prefs ... (1997)
Date problems-more (1997)
emailer (1997)
completed orders database (1997)