Re: CommandSecurity duplication?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2000
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 34363
interpreted = N
texte = >I am not sure if this has been covered. . . > >In an attempt to solve a degrading performance issue on my NT server, I was >reading the WebCatalog Prefs and noticed a double entry for CommandSecurity. >Both are set to 'T'. If I change the Command Security to 'Allow all >commands', the prefs only update one(the top most one) of the >CommandSecurity values to 'F'. > >I doubt that this is causing any real problems, but I just wanted to know if >I was the only one that had a double entry. . .No you're not, I reported this situation to Grant several months ago. He says only the first one counts, so with any luck you can ignore the second one. Just don't make the mistake of editing only the second one if you edit your prefs file manually -- or your changes will be ignored. This is obviously one of those things that should be fixed, so people don't get confused and edit the wrong one, but it probably won't be ... ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
>I am not sure if this has been covered. . . > >In an attempt to solve a degrading performance issue on my NT server, I was >reading the WebCatalog Prefs and noticed a double entry for CommandSecurity. >Both are set to 'T'. If I change the Command Security to 'Allow all >commands', the prefs only update one(the top most one) of the >CommandSecurity values to 'F'. > >I doubt that this is causing any real problems, but I just wanted to know if >I was the only one that had a double entry. . .No you're not, I reported this situation to Grant several months ago. He says only the first one counts, so with any luck you can ignore the second one. Just don't make the mistake of editing only the second one if you edit your prefs file manually -- or your changes will be ignored. This is obviously one of those things that should be fixed, so people don't get confused and edit the wrong one, but it probably won't be ... ================================ Kenneth Grome, WebDNA Consultant 808-737-6499 http://webdna.net ================================------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat & Oracle (2001)
WebCat2final1 crashes (1997)
Multiple prices (1997)
WC1.6 to WC2 date formatting (1997)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997)
value=[variable] (2001)
REPOST: The old multiple selection bit (2000)
Size limit for tmpl editor ? (1997)
Using Applescript to process WebCatalog functions (1998)
RE: FileMaker and WebCat (1999)
accessing Webcat from another server (2000)
RE: Which [index]? (1997)
Separate SSL Server (1997)
Sku numbers (1997)
WebCat2 several catalogs? (1997)
PIXO with cometsite ... and/or other plugins (1998)
WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997)
HELP WITH DATES (1997)
form image (2000)
WebCatalog can't find database (1997)