Re: authorizenet and netscape
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 40854
interpreted = N
texte = Hello Art,I just ran a transaction with Netscape 4.7 and it worked fine (I'm using Relay Response method as I suspect you are). I previously ran into AuthorizeNet issues with their newly implemented referrer URL checks (across browsers) and the solution for me was to specify ONLY the primary domain as the Valid Browser Referrer URL. In other words, you would specify only https://www.mydomain.com/ as opposed to https://www.mydomain.com/payment.tpl or such. This meets the requirements for having a valid referrer URL and may avoid the problems you are seeing with Netscape. Just a thought. Good luck!Brian >I just got off the phone with authorizenet > >According to them, since they implemented their new security measure, of >making refferer relay and response required, they have had issues with some >versions of netscape 6. > >I tried with both netscape 6.2.3, and 6.2.1 and they don't work >Also the new netscape 7 will not work with authorizenet either, > >The only way is to use the direct connection. > >ART Brian Wachter Stoneport Technologies, LLC (207) 772-3826 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Hello Art,I just ran a transaction with Netscape 4.7 and it worked fine (I'm using Relay Response method as I suspect you are). I previously ran into AuthorizeNet issues with their newly implemented referrer URL checks (across browsers) and the solution for me was to specify ONLY the primary domain as the Valid Browser Referrer URL. In other words, you would specify only https://www.mydomain.com/ as opposed to https://www.mydomain.com/payment.tpl or such. This meets the requirements for having a valid referrer URL and may avoid the problems you are seeing with Netscape. Just a thought. Good luck!Brian >I just got off the phone with authorizenet > >According to them, since they implemented their new security measure, of >making refferer relay and response required, they have had issues with some >versions of netscape 6. > >I tried with both netscape 6.2.3, and 6.2.1 and they don't work >Also the new netscape 7 will not work with authorizenet either, > >The only way is to use the direct connection. > >ART Brian Wachter Stoneport Technologies, LLC (207) 772-3826 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Brian Wachter
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Moving Files (2000)
Problems with Frames (1998)
[format xs] freeze (1997)
[WebDNA] triggers executed at boot instead of scheduled time (2011)
remotely add + sign (1997)
[OT] Mac Browser Performance Tips (1999)
[OT] mozilla / Seamonkey (2007)
Counting LineItems (2000)
WebDelivery downloads alias, not original ? (1997)
Reversed words (1997)
More Applescript (1997)
greater than or equal to (1997)
auction system w/ Web Cat (1999)
Append File help needed (2000)
Errata: WCS Newbie question (1997)
[WebDNA] [OFF TOPIC] -NEW HTC EVO 4G and SMSI (2010)
Which beta for w* 4.1 and a problem w/b12 (1999)
Time code! (2002)
Big Databases (1997)
RE: [WebDNA] serving multiple sites in localhost mode on OSX? (2010)