Re: SMSI -- a [notfound] context?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2002
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 41117
interpreted = N
texte = On 7/1/02 5:55 PM, Stuart Tremain mashed the following keys :> Please do it !!!> -- > Stuart Tremain> idfk web developments - Australia> > On Tuesday, 2 July 2002, Scott Anderson
wrote:>> This would be fairly easy to implement. But it should probably be qualified>> by a new [search] parameter....[Search db=......&Unmatched=T] then instead>> of a new [NotFound] context, just use the existing [FoundItems] context to>> display the 'UnMatched' records. This way, other search attributes and>> aggregates could still be applied.>> >> Thanks for the suggestion.>> >> Anyone else who is interested in this feature, please 'speak>> up'.I really like the idea, but I'm not sure about the implementation youdescribe. How would you differentiate the results?[founditems] [if [notfound]=t] [then]blah[/then] [else]blah[/else] [/if][/founditems]Something like that? Without something like the [notfond] in there, howwould you know which was which? -------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
On 7/1/02 5:55 PM, Stuart Tremain mashed the following keys :> Please do it !!!> -- > Stuart Tremain> idfk web developments - Australia> > On Tuesday, 2 July 2002, Scott Anderson wrote:>> This would be fairly easy to implement. But it should probably be qualified>> by a new [search] parameter....[Search db=......&Unmatched=T] then instead>> of a new [NotFound] context, just use the existing [founditems] context to>> display the 'UnMatched' records. This way, other search attributes and>> aggregates could still be applied.>> >> Thanks for the suggestion.>> >> Anyone else who is interested in this feature, please 'speak>> up'.I really like the idea, but I'm not sure about the implementation youdescribe. How would you differentiate the results?[founditems] [if [notfound]=t] [then]blah[/then] [else]blah[/else] [/if][/founditems]Something like that? Without something like the [notfond] in there, howwould you know which was which? -------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/
Aaron Lynch
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Authorize.net questions ... (2003)
writing orders to a db (1997)
[UPPERCASE] (1997)
WebCat2b15MacPlugin - showing [math] (1997)
Multiple Items (1998)
RE: Problems reading files created by WC (1997)
Grep and <> (2005)
includes and cart numbers (1997)
DDEConnect and MSWord (1998)
Two prices in shoppingcart? (1997)
Out of the woodwork (2007)
Size of File (2006)
Apoligy (1997)
Netscape Error Message Document Contains No Data (1998)
[showif]/[hideif] question (1997)
Help name our technology! I found it (1997)
off topic - dna snipets (1997)
dollar $ signs in database (2000)
setting taxable to true (1997)
Forumulas.db & Variables (2002)