Re: Email address checker

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2002


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 43827
interpreted = N
texte = on 9/25/02 3:25 PM, John Peacock at jpeacock@rowman.com so noted...> Please be aware that this is only a minimal checker for a potentially valid > e-mail address. The only 100% accurate way to test a given e-mail address is > to sucessfully deliver e-mail to the account. AFAIK, it is legal under the > RFC's to have a comma in an e-mail address (and lots of other odd characters).Yes, it's only a basic syntax checker. a@b.c will pass as valid. Primarily it was used to force AOL users to enter username@aol.com for an email address instead of User Name as they were prone to do.I could have sworn at the time I set it up that I had read an RFC stating that the comma was an invalid character. It could be removed from the search strings if not. Rob Marquardt Designer/Resident Wirehead Toast Design800 Washington Avenue North Minneapolis MN 55401 612.330.9863 v 612.321.9424 f www.toastdesign.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Email address checker (Glenn Busbin 2002)
  2. Re: Email address checker (John Peacock 2002)
  3. Re: Email address checker (dale's stuff 2002)
  4. Re: Email address checker (Rob Marquardt 2002)
  5. Re: Email address checker (John Peacock 2002)
  6. Re: Email address checker (Michael Davis 2002)
  7. Re: Email address checker (Rob Marquardt 2002)
  8. Re: Email address checker (Mark Derrick 2002)
  9. Re: Email address checker (Donovan 2002)
  10. Re: Email address checker (Donovan 2002)
  11. Email address checker (Mark Derrick 2002)
on 9/25/02 3:25 PM, John Peacock at jpeacock@rowman.com so noted...> Please be aware that this is only a minimal checker for a potentially valid > e-mail address. The only 100% accurate way to test a given e-mail address is > to sucessfully deliver e-mail to the account. AFAIK, it is legal under the > RFC's to have a comma in an e-mail address (and lots of other odd characters).Yes, it's only a basic syntax checker. a@b.c will pass as valid. Primarily it was used to force AOL users to enter username@aol.com for an email address instead of User Name as they were prone to do.I could have sworn at the time I set it up that I had read an RFC stating that the comma was an invalid character. It could be removed from the search strings if not. Rob Marquardt Designer/Resident Wirehead Toast Design800 Washington Avenue North Minneapolis MN 55401 612.330.9863 v 612.321.9424 f www.toastdesign.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://search.smithmicro.com/ Rob Marquardt

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Fun with dates (1997) Incorrect Value Display (2000) [WriteFile] problems (1997) Accented chars and emailer (1998) WebCatalog on Solaris? (2000) converchars in sendmail context.... (2004) Hiding HTML in an [include] file... (2004) UnitShopCost (2007) Sorting by date (1997) GuestBook example (1997) WebCat editing, SiteGuard & SiteEdit (1997) Problem with updating 2.1b7 -> 2.1.1 (1998) Emailer (1997) Monthly Reports (2000) Table code broken? (2004) No luck with taxes (1997) Location of Browser Info.txt file (1997) Scope of variables in multi include files (2000) PCS Frames (1997) Remove from list server (1997)