Re: [OT] DOD again

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 46674
interpreted = N
texte = I have see a few hits in my logs with users that have no browsername showing up. Quite the conspiracy we have going here.BB-----Original Message----- From: WebCatalog Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of Glenn Busbin Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:32 PM To: WebCatalog Talk Subject: Re: [OT] DOD again >Ok, maybe I AM getting paranoid now, but the MINUTE I turned on my computer this morning I got pinged by the Department of Defense. Not my website, mind you, MY PERSONAL WORKSTATION.What have you done that would get the attention of the federales? Never mind. Don't put any incriminating statements on the list. Send them to me in private.I suspect that you might also be a victim of searches by some of Dubya's overzealous minions. I have no such hits from them on my personal machines so far, but see a lotta suspicious stuff in web logs. The ones from the feds are spooky enough, but the ones that show up in the log analysis as [domain not given] or a domain of 12 or 4 give me the willies.I also noticed someone browsing a site, but WC records no referrer, even though the presence of a cookie indicates that it's not a bot. I haven't figured out how that happens.Glenn------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Alex McCombie 2003)
  2. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  3. Re: [OT] DOD again *MYSTERY SOLVED* (Dan Strong 2003)
  4. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  5. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  6. Re: [OT] DOD again (SREGALADO@aol.com 2003)
  7. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  8. Re: [OT] DOD again (Frank Nordberg 2003)
  9. Re: [OT] DOD again (Donovan 2003)
  10. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  11. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  12. Re: [OT] DOD again (Gyuri 2003)
  13. Re: [OT] DOD again (Donovan 2003)
  14. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  15. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  16. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  17. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  18. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  19. Re: [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
  20. Re: [OT] DOD again (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  21. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  22. Re: [OT] DOD again (Brian Boegershausen 2003)
  23. Re: [OT] DOD again (Glenn Busbin 2003)
  24. Re: [OT] DOD again (Alex McCombie 2003)
  25. Re: [OT] DOD again (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  26. Re: [OT] DOD again (Brian Boegershausen 2003)
  27. [OT] DOD again (Dan Strong 2003)
I have see a few hits in my logs with users that have no browsername showing up. Quite the conspiracy we have going here.BB-----Original Message----- From: WebCatalog Talk [mailto:WebDNA-Talk@talk.smithmicro.com]On Behalf Of Glenn Busbin Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:32 PM To: WebCatalog Talk Subject: Re: [OT] DOD again >Ok, maybe I AM getting paranoid now, but the MINUTE I turned on my computer this morning I got pinged by the Department of Defense. Not my website, mind you, MY PERSONAL WORKSTATION.What have you done that would get the attention of the federales? Never mind. Don't put any incriminating statements on the list. Send them to me in private.I suspect that you might also be a victim of searches by some of Dubya's overzealous minions. I have no such hits from them on my personal machines so far, but see a lotta suspicious stuff in web logs. The ones from the feds are spooky enough, but the ones that show up in the log analysis as [domain not given] or a domain of 12 or 4 give me the willies.I also noticed someone browsing a site, but WC records no referrer, even though the presence of a cookie indicates that it's not a bot. I haven't figured out how that happens.Glenn------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Brian Boegershausen

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

TCP Connect (2000) Help! WebCat2 bug (1997) Repost: Upload file limits (2000) file upload (2001) Trying to loop for letters (1999) Protecting Realms (1998) Download Question (1997) shipcost (1997) RE: Error: template (1997) [searchString] (1997) Sendmail & Spell Checker (2001) Emailer (1998) NT or Mac (1997) Pithy questions on webcommerce & siteedit (1997) Trouble with formula.db (1997) Price Change (2000) Testing the WebCat Email List Members (2000) Web Catalog Instability (2000) Date format problems (1997) WebCat for Site Search? (1997)