Re: WebDNA 5.0 Questions
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 47807
interpreted = N
texte = On 2/15/03 11:33 AM, Paul Willis
wrote:> If you want your WebDNA to be just like it is now you just need the> standard software with one sandboxActually Paul, I don't think this is right. Scott specifically said that thesandbox feature has NOTHING to do with the licensing per 'domain','website', or whatever they call it.The next thing we are waiting to hear is from Doug explaining EXACTLY whatdistinguishes a website/domain.If it turns out that it was just a sandbox thing, then I (personally) am inthe free and clear as essentially my 4.x version is running under a single'sandbox' (secure/insecure cross environment) as it always has been.I had hope that being attached to a sandbox for licensing would resolve it(at least for me) but with the sandboxes not deciding factor as to what awebsite is (per Scott) it appears I could still be in hot water.Look forward to the definitive definition.AlexAlex J McCombie New World MediaChief Information Officer Drawer 607800/724.8973 Fair Haven, NY 13064Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.comInterface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
On 2/15/03 11:33 AM, Paul Willis wrote:> If you want your WebDNA to be just like it is now you just need the> standard software with one sandboxActually Paul, I don't think this is right. Scott specifically said that thesandbox feature has NOTHING to do with the licensing per 'domain','website', or whatever they call it.The next thing we are waiting to hear is from Doug explaining EXACTLY whatdistinguishes a website/domain.If it turns out that it was just a sandbox thing, then I (personally) am inthe free and clear as essentially my 4.x version is running under a single'sandbox' (secure/insecure cross environment) as it always has been.I had hope that being attached to a sandbox for licensing would resolve it(at least for me) but with the sandboxes not deciding factor as to what awebsite is (per Scott) it appears I could still be in hot water.Look forward to the definitive definition.AlexAlex J McCombie New World MediaChief Information Officer Drawer 607800/724.8973 Fair Haven, NY 13064Alex@NewWorldMedia.com http://OurClients.comInterface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Alex McCombie
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Major Security Hole (1998)
Frames and WebCat (1997)
Date Calulation (1997)
Progress !! WAS: Trouble with formula.db (1997)
possible, WebCat2.0 and checkboxes-restated (1997)
off topic fetch vs PCS photomaster (1997)
Re:no [search] with NT (1997)
WebCat2b13 Mac plugin - [sendmail] and checkboxes (1997)
DON'T use old cart file! (1997)
Practice runs ? (1997)
Using Japanesse text with webcat. (1998)
cart info (1998)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
looking for developers with solutions (2000)
[FoundItems] solved - thanks (1997)
show all problem (1997)
[OT] Certs (2002)
[SearchString] problem with [search] context (1997)
Error:Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
Possible Bug in 2.0b15.acgi (1997)