Re: 5.0 Pricing

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2003


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 48094
interpreted = N
texte = Couple this with Domain Masking from godaddy.com and you have a bargain ;)Domain Forwarding with Masking Domain masking lets you protect the address of a particular site, while still allowing customers to access the content. Here's how it works: First, you purchase a domain name, say, public-site.com. This is only an address, though; public-site.com is not going to have its own web site. You use this address to display the content of another web site, say, private-site.com. So your visitors type in www.public-site.com and see the display from the private-site.com web site. But they do *not* see the private-site.com address. To do this, just select Domain Forwarding with Masking. We'll take care of the rest. > > No, the sandbox feature has nothing to do with the licensing. This has been > discussed several times. You can have multiple sandboxes for each domain: > > www.mydomain.com/sandbox1 > www.mydomain.com/sandbox2 > www.mydomain.com/sandbox3 > > all running under a single site license. These are all completely > independently managed areas with seperate admin files, etc. If they did this > right, it also means that sandbox2 can die screaming due to bad code and it > won't take the whole server with it! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clint Davis 2003)
  2. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jim Lanford 2003)
  3. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Willis 2003)
  4. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
  5. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Clement Ross 2003)
  6. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  7. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Kimberly D. Walls 2003)
  8. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (John Peacock 2003)
  9. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  10. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  11. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Paul Uttermohlen 2003)
  12. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  13. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Alex McCombie 2003)
  14. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  15. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Donovan 2003)
  16. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Brian Fries 2003)
  17. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Bob Minor 2003)
  18. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  19. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  20. Re: Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (WJ Starck 2003)
  21. Was 5.0 Pricing, now Sandbox versus Website and ruminating (Phillip Bonesteele 2003)
  22. Re: 5.0 Pricing (John Peacock 2003)
  23. Re: New Title was: 5.0 pricing (laurent pladys 2003)
  24. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  25. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  26. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Bob Minor 2003)
  27. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
  28. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
  29. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Stuart Tremain 2003)
  30. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
  31. Re: 5.0 Pricing (John Peacock 2003)
  32. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
  33. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
  34. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
  35. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  36. Re: 5.0 Pricing (John Peacock 2003)
  37. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Jesse Williams-Proudman 2003)
  38. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alex McCombie 2003)
  39. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Tim Robinson 2003)
  40. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Kenneth Grome 2003)
  41. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Dale's Stuff 2003)
  42. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Christer Olsson 2003)
  43. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Brian Fries 2003)
  44. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Michael Davis 2003)
  45. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
  46. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan Brooke 2003)
  47. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  48. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Stuart Tremain 2003)
  49. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Christer Olsson 2003)
  50. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Palle Bo Nielsen 2003)
  51. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Donovan 2003)
  52. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
  53. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  54. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
  55. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Andrew Simpson 2003)
  56. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
  57. Re: 5.0 Pricing (WJ Starck 2003)
  58. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Nitai @ ComputerOil 2003)
  59. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Alain Russell 2003)
  60. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Dale's Stuff 2003)
  61. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
  62. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Doug Deck 2003)
  63. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Palle Bo Nielsen 2003)
  64. Re: 5.0 Pricing (andy mowrey 2003)
  65. Re: 5.0 Pricing (Clement Ross 2003)
  66. 5.0 Pricing (Charles Kline 2003)
Couple this with Domain Masking from godaddy.com and you have a bargain ;)Domain Forwarding with Masking Domain masking lets you protect the address of a particular site, while still allowing customers to access the content. Here's how it works: First, you purchase a domain name, say, public-site.com. This is only an address, though; public-site.com is not going to have its own web site. You use this address to display the content of another web site, say, private-site.com. So your visitors type in www.public-site.com and see the display from the private-site.com web site. But they do *not* see the private-site.com address. To do this, just select Domain Forwarding with Masking. We'll take care of the rest. > > No, the sandbox feature has nothing to do with the licensing. This has been > discussed several times. You can have multiple sandboxes for each domain: > > www.mydomain.com/sandbox1 > www.mydomain.com/sandbox2 > www.mydomain.com/sandbox3 > > all running under a single site license. These are all completely > independently managed areas with seperate admin files, etc. If they did this > right, it also means that sandbox2 can die screaming due to bad code and it > won't take the whole server with it! ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Alain Russell

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Multiple download orders of the same product? (1997) [WebDNA] Error 500 with SUMM=T (2017) WebCatalog2 Feature Feedback (1996) Restart of DBserver (1997) I am dumb. No see [variable] (2003) b12 cannot limit records returned and more. (1997) Frames and WebCat (1997) WebCat editing, SiteGuard & SiteEdit (1997) selecting multiple found items (1997) Menu to select product variations (1997) WebCatalog can't find database (1997) problems with WebCat-Plugin (1997) Here we go again... (2006) Problems reading files created by WC (1997) HomePage Caution (1997) webcat pro (1998) Emailer again & again (1997) problems with 2 tags (1997) Wits end with this [sendmail] problem. ;) (2000) snicker, snicker (1997)