Re: Inprovement to listfiles ...
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 50022
interpreted = N
texte = Actually I have always felt that it would be best to have a full range of search parameters available for use in listfiles, kind of like this:[listfiles path=a/b/c/&geMODDATE=04/15/2003&geSIZE=24K&eqISFILE=T&bwFILENAME=ad] >Ken not a bad idea, but I think that the current way gives a bit >more flexibility, if you want to handle folders differently to files >you can do it in the one ListFiles. Otherwise you would have to do >two ListFiles, that would not work if you wanted to have a sorted >list of what was in the directory you were listing. > >BUT if you could do BOTH .... now that would be good. > > >On Monday, May 5, 2003, at 11:52 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote: > >>It seems to me that this (proposed) syntax: >> >>[listfiles path=stores/[site]/&isFile=T] >>[/listfiles] >> >>... would be an improvement over this (existing) syntax: >>[listfiles path=stores/[site]/] >>[showif [isfile]=T] >> >>[/showif] >>[/listfiles] >> >>... because it's faster to write and possibly more efficient to >>process. What does anyone else think? >>-- >> >>Sincerely, >>Kenneth Grome >>------------------------------------------------------------- >>My programmers will write WebDNA code for you at $27 an hour! >>------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>------------------------------------------------------------- >>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list
. >>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >> >>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ >> >Regards > >Stuart Tremain >idfk web developments >114a/40 yeo street neutral bay 2089 australia >t +612 9908 2134 >f +612 9908 4837 > > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ -- Sincerely, Kenneth Grome ------------------------------------------------------------- My programmers will write WebDNA code for you at $27 an hour! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Actually I have always felt that it would be best to have a full range of search parameters available for use in listfiles, kind of like this:[listfiles path=a/b/c/&geMODDATE=04/15/2003&geSIZE=24K&eqISFILE=T&bwFILENAME=ad] >Ken not a bad idea, but I think that the current way gives a bit >more flexibility, if you want to handle folders differently to files >you can do it in the one ListFiles. Otherwise you would have to do >two ListFiles, that would not work if you wanted to have a sorted >list of what was in the directory you were listing. > >BUT if you could do BOTH .... now that would be good. > > >On Monday, May 5, 2003, at 11:52 PM, Kenneth Grome wrote: > >>It seems to me that this (proposed) syntax: >> >>[listfiles path=stores/[site]/&isFile=T] >>[/listfiles] >> >>... would be an improvement over this (existing) syntax: >>[listfiles path=stores/[site]/] >>[showif [isfile]=T] >> >>[/showif] >>[/listfiles] >> >>... because it's faster to write and possibly more efficient to >>process. What does anyone else think? >>-- >> >>Sincerely, >>Kenneth Grome >>------------------------------------------------------------- >>My programmers will write WebDNA code for you at $27 an hour! >>------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>------------------------------------------------------------- >>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >> >>Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ >> >Regards > >Stuart Tremain >idfk web developments >114a/40 yeo street neutral bay 2089 australia >t +612 9908 2134 >f +612 9908 4837 > > > >------------------------------------------------------------- >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > >Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ -- Sincerely, Kenneth Grome ------------------------------------------------------------- My programmers will write WebDNA code for you at $27 an hour! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Kenneth Grome
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Before I Can Begin . . . (1998)
Creating 404 Not Found pages (1999)
Associative lookup style? + bit more (1997)
expire headers in mac305b11 (1999)
Hiding HTML and page breaks (1997)
Kaaaaahhhhhhhnnnnnnn! (1997)
Formatting date to number - more (2000)
unique ascending numbers (2003)
Another StoreBuilder Question (2003)
Emailer (1997)
[WebDNA] WebDNA & Prism (2018)
I can help! (1996)
[random] only for 1-100??? (1997)
This Code Kills My WebCatalog Dead (2003)
[WebDNA] doesn't "&max=1" work in a [delete] context?, & [OT] thanks. (2009)
Revisit: speed test (2002)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
WebCommerce: Folder organization ? (1997)
Associative lookup style? + bit more (1997)
Nested tags count question (1997)