Re: [OT] Re: Read and weep
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2003
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 53951
interpreted = N
texte = One other thing, taking a look at a site where it works does not help=20in getting it configured on our machines.On Nov 11, 2003, at 2:41 PM, Phillip Bonesteele wrote:>> I haven't seen any specific problems described with using WebDNA with=20=> SQL> Server via ODBC. We have not experienced any problems with any of the> customer sites we have done with such a configuration.>> Take a look at http://www.harman-multimedia.com>> Dual server network load balanced web farm running WebDNA, with a dual> server active/passive MS SQL Server cluster on the backend. It didn't=20=> take> anything special to make work, and it's been up for a couple of years=20=> now.>> Phil B.>> -----Original Message-----> From: CN Stuff> To: WebDNA Talk> Sent: 11/11/03 12:32 PM> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Read and weep>>> On Nov 11, 2003, at 1:36 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:>>> Nitai @ ComputerOil wrote:>> [snip]>>>> I will even say, that PHP got so big, because they have a complete> SQL>>> (MySQL) integration done. This is mostly all what people care about.>>> Sad but>>> true.>>> Don=B9t get me wrong, but did you ever try to sell a very big =company a>>>> WebDNA>>> solution based on the flat files system. We have lost 4 pitches>>> because of>>> that. They all went with a system (less featured packed as ours) =with>>>> a SQL>>> database (because of their backends).>>>> Well, we do have the ability to hook into SQL backends...>> Unfortunately too many people have tried for YEARS to get WebDNA to> talk to an SQL database with no luck. It should not take 6+ months =just> to get that advertised functionality to work.>> Based on my personal experience WebDNA does in fact not talk to SQL> databases. And not just because I have not been able to get it to =work,> but based on how many have tried and failed and have ended up using a> different solution because of how difficult it is to get it to work.>> Dale=-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
One other thing, taking a look at a site where it works does not help=20in getting it configured on our machines.On Nov 11, 2003, at 2:41 PM, Phillip Bonesteele wrote:>> I haven't seen any specific problems described with using WebDNA with=20=> SQL> Server via ODBC. We have not experienced any problems with any of the> customer sites we have done with such a configuration.>> Take a look at http://www.harman-multimedia.com>> Dual server network load balanced web farm running WebDNA, with a dual> server active/passive MS SQL Server cluster on the backend. It didn't=20=> take> anything special to make work, and it's been up for a couple of years=20=> now.>> Phil B.>> -----Original Message-----> From: CN Stuff> To: WebDNA Talk> Sent: 11/11/03 12:32 PM> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Read and weep>>> On Nov 11, 2003, at 1:36 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:>>> Nitai @ ComputerOil wrote:>> [snip]>>>> I will even say, that PHP got so big, because they have a complete> SQL>>> (MySQL) integration done. This is mostly all what people care about.>>> Sad but>>> true.>>> Don=B9t get me wrong, but did you ever try to sell a very big =company a>>>> WebDNA>>> solution based on the flat files system. We have lost 4 pitches>>> because of>>> that. They all went with a system (less featured packed as ours) =with>>>> a SQL>>> database (because of their backends).>>>> Well, we do have the ability to hook into SQL backends...>> Unfortunately too many people have tried for YEARS to get WebDNA to> talk to an SQL database with no luck. It should not take 6+ months =just> to get that advertised functionality to work.>> Based on my personal experience WebDNA does in fact not talk to SQL> databases. And not just because I have not been able to get it to =work,> but based on how many have tried and failed and have ended up using a> different solution because of how difficult it is to get it to work.>> Dale=-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
CN Stuff
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Showing unopened cart (1997)
A workaround for handling date range search in yyyy/mm/dd form (1997)
FAX orders (1996)
[format] problems (1998)
What is wrong here? (2000)
WebCat2 - [include] tags (1997)
b12 cannot limit records returned and more. (1997)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Error:Too many nested [xxx] contexts (1997)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Follow-Up to: Removing [showif] makes a big difference in speed (1997)
searching with groups (1997)
Re:Emailer and encryption (1997)
problems with 2 tags (1997)
[carts] and databases (1997)
WebCat2final1 crashes (1997)
IE Cache Problems... (1999)
[WebDNA] CURL help required (2011)
RE: type 2 errors with ssl server (1997)
OT Pager notification of completed orders (1998)