Re: FW: weird problem
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 56690
interpreted = N
texte = WebDna @ Inkblot Media wrote: > Sheesh ... you guys are picky. Well, "you guys" I guess is including me. I want to make it clear that I wasn't "jumping" on Art. I simply had the day off and didn't want to take the time to read the long post... however, I did briefly see search vars that didn't have URL's and it is my opinion that it is better safe than sorry to include url's around the search values (thus I mentioned it). Jump on people for not posting code, picking > on people for too much code. Perhaps someone would like to explain exactly > how one should go about posting for support. Hmm, it appears to me Ronald that you are consistant in the opinion that we as a helper community should not have any opinions on "how folks should post to the list". If that is true then I disagree. I agree about toneality and such but, there just *are* good and bad ways to post to the list. No one is going to ban anyone for posting a novel or posting a cryptic mess (I've actually never seen a moderated post before) but, it is probably good, for both the poster and the list, that someone mentions that posting "novels" and "cryptic messes", are bad (not referring to any post in particular). "Bad" might be discerned by (but not limited by): 1. Those that want to help will find it much easier to troubleshoot a cleanly posted code snippet. 2. The person posting is more likely to get a better response (or a response at all) by posting cleanly formated and relevent code. I don't fault an "elder" for reminding people of this every now and then. Respect is always good when responding, but respect for "our elders" (of this list) is also important (probably more so since we've all benefited from their knowledge in the past). I guess I don't think Ken's post was over the top at all. but of course, that is only my opinion. :-) Tomarrow's another day (and I will have to actually work! :-( ) Donovan -- =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o DONOVAN D. BROOKE Eucalyptus Design <-Web Development (specializing in eCommerce), -> <-Graphic Design, and Pre-Press Consultation -> ADDRESS:> Donovan Brooke DBA Eucalyptus Design N2862 Summerville Park Rd. Lodi, WI 53555 PH:> 1.608.592.3567 Web:> http://www.euca.us =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
WebDna @ Inkblot Media wrote: > Sheesh ... you guys are picky. Well, "you guys" I guess is including me. I want to make it clear that I wasn't "jumping" on Art. I simply had the day off and didn't want to take the time to read the long post... however, I did briefly see search vars that didn't have URL's and it is my opinion that it is better safe than sorry to include url's around the search values (thus I mentioned it). Jump on people for not posting code, picking > on people for too much code. Perhaps someone would like to explain exactly > how one should go about posting for support. Hmm, it appears to me Ronald that you are consistant in the opinion that we as a helper community should not have any opinions on "how folks should post to the list". If that is true then I disagree. I agree about toneality and such but, there just *are* good and bad ways to post to the list. No one is going to ban anyone for posting a novel or posting a cryptic mess (I've actually never seen a moderated post before) but, it is probably good, for both the poster and the list, that someone mentions that posting "novels" and "cryptic messes", are bad (not referring to any post in particular). "Bad" might be discerned by (but not limited by): 1. Those that want to help will find it much easier to troubleshoot a cleanly posted code snippet. 2. The person posting is more likely to get a better response (or a response at all) by posting cleanly formated and relevent code. I don't fault an "elder" for reminding people of this every now and then. Respect is always good when responding, but respect for "our elders" (of this list) is also important (probably more so since we've all benefited from their knowledge in the past). I guess I don't think Ken's post was over the top at all. but of course, that is only my opinion. :-) Tomarrow's another day (and I will have to actually work! :-( ) Donovan -- =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o DONOVAN D. BROOKE Eucalyptus Design <-Web Development (specializing in eCommerce), -> <-Graphic Design, and Pre-Press Consultation -> ADDRESS:> Donovan Brooke DBA Eucalyptus Design N2862 Summerville Park Rd. Lodi, WI 53555 PH:> 1.608.592.3567 Web:> http://www.euca.us =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Donovan Brooke
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997)
Weird Problem (1997)
[WebDNA] Yosemite (2014)
Jimmy (1998)
Re[3]: Problem with new formvariables (2000)
Web Catalog 2 demo (1997)
Search Question (2000)
wild question (1998)
RE: [countChars] from