Re: Problem with broken images
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 56746
interpreted = N
texte = - I'm serving on W* 5.3.2 on OS 10.2 - I have compared the source data from a couple of browsers that showed a broken image, but the html is OK - Images do work for _most_ users. (I hate it when that happens. All or none would be much preferable.) > Is webdna setting the [rid] value or is this a file name that's > picked up by the browser when the visitor selects the file to be > uploaded? Maybe the file name is sometimes incompatible with the OS > you're using which is ... ? [rid] is the unique number of the forum post, pulled from a db. I also use it as the file name to make sure all the image are also unique and eliminate the need for another search. > Are your visitors actually uploading image files? Many times on my > jobs website the visitors fail to recognize that a word file with a > picture in it is not a .gif or a .jpg file. The file is uploaded > properly but cannot be displayed so the browser shows its 'broken > image" icon instead. Yes, they are uploading themselves and we do get a little junk. But they get to preview the upload before they post it (and abort if doesn't display) which has cut down on the trash. But as I said, it works for most, and for every user on XP / IE 6.x who gets a broken image I have another who can load it just fine. My current theory is that popup killers or other security software doesn't like the numeric image file names (or the two dots) but I don't have enough evidence (or understanding of those utilities) to know for sure. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
- I'm serving on W* 5.3.2 on OS 10.2 - I have compared the source data from a couple of browsers that showed a broken image, but the html is OK - Images do work for _most_ users. (I hate it when that happens. All or none would be much preferable.) > Is webdna setting the [rid] value or is this a file name that's > picked up by the browser when the visitor selects the file to be > uploaded? Maybe the file name is sometimes incompatible with the OS > you're using which is ... ? [rid] is the unique number of the forum post, pulled from a db. I also use it as the file name to make sure all the image are also unique and eliminate the need for another search. > Are your visitors actually uploading image files? Many times on my > jobs website the visitors fail to recognize that a word file with a > picture in it is not a .gif or a .jpg file. The file is uploaded > properly but cannot be displayed so the browser shows its 'broken > image" icon instead. Yes, they are uploading themselves and we do get a little junk. But they get to preview the upload before they post it (and abort if doesn't display) which has cut down on the trash. But as I said, it works for most, and for every user on XP / IE 6.x who gets a broken image I have another who can load it just fine. My current theory is that popup killers or other security software doesn't like the numeric image file names (or the two dots) but I don't have enough evidence (or understanding of those utilities) to know for sure. ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Phil Herring
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
all records returned. (1997)
OK, here goes... (1997)
WebMerchant 1.6 and SHTML (1997)
Field name-subcategory (1997)
RE: creating writefile data from a nested search (1997)
Re[2]: php vs WebCatalog (2000)
WebCat, The Trend, & Consolidating... (1997)
taxTotal, grandTotal (1997)
More Shopping Cart Problems (2000)
WebCat2b13MacPlugin - [math][date][/math] problem (1997)
Problems with store (1998)
[WebDNA] TLS 1.2 and [tcpconnect] (2018)
locking variables? (2000)
Here we go again...WebDNA - SQL- Clustering (2006)
Math Context (1998)
group searching problem (2002)
[WebDNA] Press Release (2008)
Trouble with Netscape (1998)
Wanted: Broader string manipulation functions (1997)
OK, here goes... (1997)