Re: MIMEHeaders

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2004


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 57143
interpreted = N
texte = Frank Nordberg wrote: > The "error message" doesn't seem to be among the mime headers that can > be set by WebDNA, but I hope I'm wrong. I could really use thatfunction > myself. The MIME headers are designed to be machine readable; the number is the only thing that is required. The 301 is correct and appropriate. Any "error message" sent by the remote site associated with that status code is completely ignored. It is there strictly so that the entire HTTP transaction is human readable. John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: mimeheaders to allow back button to work on a posted page? ( Stuart Tremain 2004)
  2. Re: mimeheaders to allow back button to work on a posted page? ( eLists 2004)
  3. Re: mimeheaders to allow back button to work on a posted page? ( "Sal D'Anna" 2004)
  4. Re: mimeheaders to allow back button to work on a posted page? ( Brian Fries 2004)
  5. mimeheaders to allow back button to work on a posted page? ( eLists 2004)
  6. Re: MIMEHeaders ( John Peacock 2004)
  7. Re: MIMEHeaders ( Frank Nordberg 2004)
  8. MIMEHeaders ( Steve Craig 2004)
  9. Re: Mimeheaders parameters, which exist? ( Glenn Busbin 2003)
  10. Mimeheaders parameters, which exist? ( Palle Bo Nielsen 2003)
Frank Nordberg wrote: > The "error message" doesn't seem to be among the mime headers that can > be set by WebDNA, but I hope I'm wrong. I could really use thatfunction > myself. The MIME headers are designed to be machine readable; the number is the only thing that is required. The 301 is correct and appropriate. Any "error message" sent by the remote site associated with that status code is completely ignored. It is there strictly so that the entire HTTP transaction is human readable. John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ John Peacock

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

Some ThankYou page problems (1997) WebCat B13 Mac CGI -- Frames question (1997) A sendmail warning (2005) BBEdit WedDNA Codeless Language Module (2004) Sorting error (1997) OT: Javascript Jump Menu (2004) boldwords funky (1998) Sorting a summary (2000) Error Log.db --however (1997) Emailer Chokes on bad address (1997) Help name our technology! (1997) [WebDNA] Extracting contents of a div (2012) [searchString] (1997) Hyperboard/bulletin board available (1998) # fields limited? (1997) So many lookers, hey smith micro (2003) Dynamic Pop up menu? (1997) Date Calulation (1997) How fast is your server? (2002) credit card - Revised (1997)