Re: shell question
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 59828
interpreted = N
texte = Terry Wilson wrote:> Thanks Bill. Are you suggesting the semicolon separating the two > commands is being tripped up by permissions, or the [shell] context as a > whole is being tripped up? The first line of the command works, and > those results display. It's doing the second command that fails. So the > [shell] itself is working.Show us the actual commands you are trying to run; letting us guess isn't going to help you. Yes, Bill is probably correct that your problem is permissions (since that is the root cause of virtually all [shell] difficulties). But without knowing what you are running, we cannot help further. FWIW, you probably don't want to use a semicolon; seperating the two commands by && will mean that the second will run iff the first ran without error (and is a much better way to handle multiple commands).John-- John PeacockDirector of Information Research and TechnologyRowman & Littlefield Publishing Group4720 Boston WayLanham, MD 20706301-459-3366 x.5010fax 301-429-5747-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
.To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Terry Wilson wrote:> Thanks Bill. Are you suggesting the semicolon separating the two > commands is being tripped up by permissions, or the [shell] context as a > whole is being tripped up? The first line of the command works, and > those results display. It's doing the second command that fails. So the > [shell] itself is working.Show us the actual commands you are trying to run; letting us guess isn't going to help you. Yes, Bill is probably correct that your problem is permissions (since that is the root cause of virtually all [shell] difficulties). But without knowing what you are running, we cannot help further. FWIW, you probably don't want to use a semicolon; seperating the two commands by && will mean that the second will run iff the first ran without error (and is a much better way to handle multiple commands).John-- John PeacockDirector of Information Research and TechnologyRowman & Littlefield Publishing Group4720 Boston WayLanham, MD 20706301-459-3366 x.5010fax 301-429-5747-------------------------------------------------------------This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list .To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
John Peacock
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Country & Ship-to address & other fields ? (1997)
Help! WebCat2 bug (1997)
Bug Report, maybe (1997)
[Sum] function? (1997)
How to find duplicates - With code samples (2000)
[WriteFile] problems (1997)
Requiring that certain fields be completed (1997)
in header include files? (1998)
Using Applescript to process WebCatalog functions (1998)
User agent based content... (2004)
Sample Tearoom Search Error - Solved! (1997)
WebCat2: Items xx to xx shown, etc. (1997)
Re:listfiles-looking for slick solution (1997)
How to Sort Summ data ? (1997)
Emailer (1997)
WebDNA Docs (2003)
New Featured Site (1999)
Re:Virtual hosting and webcatNT (1997)
WebDNA equivalent for $REQUEST_URI (2004)
autocommit problem (1998)