Re: Bad Cookie / Internet Option / Internet Explorer
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2004
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 60566
interpreted = N
texte = Donovan Brooke wrote: > Works right? Yup. > > Only difference is this is a GET (URL) method. Except it also doesn't have all of the multiple redirects before the final page, too, which I think is a more likely source of difficulties > > I just now decided to add your MIMEHeaders.inc file. but I'm not sure if > that is > approaching the problem. Its almost like the page is expiring before it > is being hit. Expires as it is hit, yes. > > If I remember right, W3C states that POST method was initially designed > for the purpose of sending form input that is not supposed to be > retrievable after being > sent (however most browsers let you do a "refresh" to get the content > back). So, > maybe I'll try setting the expires into the future? Yes, give it a short expires to see if that works (5 seconds?). John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Donovan Brooke wrote: > Works right? Yup. > > Only difference is this is a GET (URL) method. Except it also doesn't have all of the multiple redirects before the final page, too, which I think is a more likely source of difficulties > > I just now decided to add your MIMEHeaders.inc file. but I'm not sure if > that is > approaching the problem. Its almost like the page is expiring before it > is being hit. Expires as it is hit, yes. > > If I remember right, W3C states that POST method was initially designed > for the purpose of sending form input that is not supposed to be > retrievable after being > sent (however most browsers let you do a "refresh" to get the content > back). So, > maybe I'll try setting the expires into the future? Yes, give it a short expires to see if that works (5 seconds?). John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
John Peacock
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
Arrays (2000)
XML Woes (2004)
[WebDNA] lists opinion (2009)
Is there a way to just get to the last record in the database? (1997)
WebCat b13 CGI -shownext- (1997)
A quickie question (1997)
Emails sent twice (2000)
WebCat2b15MacPlugIn - [authenticate] not [protect] (1997)
japanese characters (1997)
RE: Cart Template (1997)
Robert Minor duplicate mail (1997)
How to add product size choices to form? (1997)
WebCatalog for Postcards ? (1997)
best way to limit # of attempts to login to protected page? (2000)
Shopping with Accounts (2003)
[WebDNA] Emailer Issue *SOLVED* (2009)
Error Lob.db records error message not name (1997)
Upcoming 2.1 Release and PCS Committment (1997)
Not reading code (1997)
SET (1998)