Re: WebDNA dying or ... ?
This WebDNA talk-list message is from 2005
It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 62453
interpreted = N
texte = Has anybody notified Pacific Coast Software? Maybe they'd want to buy it back. :-) At 12:43 PM 7/6/2005, you wrote: >Kenneth Grome wrote: >>Yet no matter what they did, it would never compensate for the fact that all the time they invested in learning and promoting the software would eventually be a total loss. Unsupported software and software that's at the end of its life with no future development is always a losing proposition ... :( > >Well, before we officially declare WebDNA for dead we ought to see what Smith Micro has to say about it of course. ;-) > >And even if they decide to end their involvment, I'm sure they'd allow somebody else to take over support and development. >If WebDNA is worth it, that is. Personally I believe it has at least one huge advantage over other cgi languages/programs: it's quite easy even for a rather inexperienced computer user to put together functional and useful scripts. I may be wrong though. I don't really know all the competitors. > > >Frank Nordberg >http://www.musicaviva.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list
. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:
Has anybody notified Pacific Coast Software? Maybe they'd want to buy it back. :-) At 12:43 PM 7/6/2005, you wrote: >Kenneth Grome wrote: >>Yet no matter what they did, it would never compensate for the fact that all the time they invested in learning and promoting the software would eventually be a total loss. Unsupported software and software that's at the end of its life with no future development is always a losing proposition ... :( > >Well, before we officially declare WebDNA for dead we ought to see what Smith Micro has to say about it of course. ;-) > >And even if they decide to end their involvment, I'm sure they'd allow somebody else to take over support and development. >If WebDNA is worth it, that is. Personally I believe it has at least one huge advantage over other cgi languages/programs: it's quite easy even for a rather inexperienced computer user to put together functional and useful scripts. I may be wrong though. I don't really know all the competitors. > > >Frank Nordberg >http://www.musicaviva.com ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/
Gary Krockover
DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!
Top Articles:
Talk List
The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...
Related Readings:
PROBLEM (1997)
Server slowing down. (1997)
FREE Web Server Monitor FREE (1997)
[Fwd: can we get string variables?] (1998)
Multiple Passwords (1997)
2nd WebCatalog2 Feature Request (1996)
WCS Newbie question (1997)
Sku numbers (1997)
[WebDNA] WebDNA licenses discount from 12/23 to 12/31 (2011)
WC2b12: Yes, Formulas.db is for real (1997)
Expected Behavior? (1999)
Searching for Email Address (2004)
comparison looking for unitialized var shows webcat bug? (2000)
[search] sort problem (2003)
Webcat interfering with Webstar? (1998)
RedHat Linux glibc version 2.1.2 or higher required (2000)
question... no field names? (2002)
Search (1997)
email server and webdna (2006)
Error -108 (1997)