SQL Madness

This WebDNA talk-list message is from

2005


It keeps the original formatting.
numero = 62603
interpreted = N
texte = Windows EXE version 6.0 Have an ODBC setup for this to MSSQL which up until now has worked wonderfully (well at least I thought so). Here is the dilemma. While trying to do a 'contains' search on any field (varchar or integer) the results are erratic when searching on anything that is number (integer) related. For example: [SQL dsn=SOMEDSN&username=SOMEUSERNAME&password=SOMEPASS &statement=SELECT * from tickets where description LIKE '%[descriptionvar]%' ORDER BY priority] [founditems] [title]
[/founditems] [/sql] Works great until you search on something like 54. So a record that has the phrase: "We ordered item number 5437. This item should be delivered promptly" In the description field (which is a varchar field) 54 Returns the proper result. However, change that search string to 543 and nothing. 5437, nothing. This is a simplistic example but I have tested this now on varchar fields and integer fields. It appears that anything over 1 or 2 chars in your search string (if they are numbers) sends back 0 results. If you search on 1 number I am getting results for records that do not even have the number in use. :_( Of course running these simple searches through query analyzer works like a charm so I am 100% certain this is a result of WebDNA communicating with MSSQL. Like I said, the interaction between the 2 has been flawless and VERY productive -- until this. Has ANYONE seen erratic results when dealing with LIKE searches and if so does anyone have any advice. I am about ready to go postal. This started as a fairly complicated search and after many hours of trying to 'fix it' reducing it to the most simple of searches showed that there is no fixing erratic results on a single variable search. Help! Alex -- Alex J McCombie Adventure Skies Interactive (ASI) Owner Box 124 888/892.6379 MartVille, NY 13111 Alex@Adventureskies.com Interface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Associated Messages, from the most recent to the oldest:

    
  1. Re: SQL Madness ( Alex McCombie 2005)
  2. Re: SQL Madness ( "Scott Anderson" 2005)
  3. Re: SQL Madness ( Alex McCombie 2005)
  4. Re: SQL Madness ( Jesse Proudman 2005)
  5. Re: SQL Madness ( "Scott Anderson" 2005)
  6. SQL Madness ( Alex McCombie 2005)
  7. SQL Madness ( Alex McCombie 2005)
Windows EXE version 6.0 Have an ODBC setup for this to MSSQL which up until now has worked wonderfully (well at least I thought so). Here is the dilemma. While trying to do a 'contains' search on any field (varchar or integer) the results are erratic when searching on anything that is number (integer) related. For example: [SQL dsn=SOMEDSN&username=SOMEUSERNAME&password=SOMEPASS &statement=SELECT * from tickets where description LIKE '%[descriptionvar]%' ORDER BY priority] [founditems] [title]
[/founditems] [/sql] Works great until you search on something like 54. So a record that has the phrase: "We ordered item number 5437. This item should be delivered promptly" In the description field (which is a varchar field) 54 Returns the proper result. However, change that search string to 543 and nothing. 5437, nothing. This is a simplistic example but I have tested this now on varchar fields and integer fields. It appears that anything over 1 or 2 chars in your search string (if they are numbers) sends back 0 results. If you search on 1 number I am getting results for records that do not even have the number in use. :_( Of course running these simple searches through query analyzer works like a charm so I am 100% certain this is a result of WebDNA communicating with MSSQL. Like I said, the interaction between the 2 has been flawless and VERY productive -- until this. Has ANYONE seen erratic results when dealing with LIKE searches and if so does anyone have any advice. I am about ready to go postal. This started as a fairly complicated search and after many hours of trying to 'fix it' reducing it to the most simple of searches showed that there is no fixing erratic results on a single variable search. Help! Alex -- Alex J McCombie Adventure Skies Interactive (ASI) Owner Box 124 888/892.6379 MartVille, NY 13111 Alex@Adventureskies.com Interface Designer WebDNA Programmer Database Designer ------------------------------------------------------------- This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list . To unsubscribe, E-mail to: To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to Web Archive of this list is at: http://webdna.smithmicro.com/ Alex McCombie

DOWNLOAD WEBDNA NOW!

Top Articles:

Talk List

The WebDNA community talk-list is the best place to get some help: several hundred extremely proficient programmers with an excellent knowledge of WebDNA and an excellent spirit will deliver all the tips and tricks you can imagine...

Related Readings:

[WebDNA] Some news (2010) [AppendFile] problem (WebCat2b13 Mac .acgi) (1997) PhotoMill -> PhotoMaster (1997) Can [writefile] files be served thru webcat? (2000) Mac -Shareware Listserver (1998) FYI: virus alert (1996) Nested [tags] (2001) [ShowNext] (1997) How do I handle extra spaces? (2002) pipe delimited crconvert database (2002) Multiple prices (1997) RAM variables (1997) Protect vs Authenicate (1997) Re:Virtual hosting and webcatNT (1997) RE: E-mailer error codes (1997) Sort Order on a page search (1997) PIXO support (1997) Next X hits (1996) Document Contains No Data! (1997) HELP WITH DATES (1997)